The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-Time Traffic Flow Parameter Estimation From UAV Video Based on Ensemble Classifier and Optical Flow
Abstract
Recently, the availability of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) opens up new opportunities for smart transportation applications, such as automatic traffic data collection. In such a trend, detecting vehicles and extracting traffic parameters from UAV video in a fast and accurate manner is becoming crucial in many prospective applications. However, from the methodological perspective, several limitations have to be addressed before the actual implementation of UAV. This paper proposes a new and complete analysis framework for traffic flow parameter estimation from UAV video. This framework addresses the well-concerned issues on UAV's irregular ego-motion, low estimation accuracy in dense traffic situation, and high computational complexity by designing and integrating four stages. In the first two stages an ensemble classifier (Haar cascade + convolutional neural network) is developed for vehicle detection, and in the last two stages a robust traffic flow parameter estimation method is developed based on optical flow and traffic flow theory. The proposed ensemble classifier is demonstrated to outperform the state-of-the-art vehicle detectors that designed for UAV-based vehicle detection. Traffic flow parameter estimations in both free flow and congested traffic conditions are evaluated, and the results turn out to be very encouraging. The dataset with 20,000 image samples used in this study is publicly accessible for benchmarking at http://www.uwstarlab.org/research.html.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alternatively, optical flow is also used in conjunction with image registration, although according to [37], optical flow and background subtraction with image registration are ineffective in detecting vehicles in dense traffic situations.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Differently, counting tasks employing the counting-by-tracking and lane-based counting approaches usually rely on traditional counting accuracy [37].”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“However, according to [37], KF and particle filtering techniques are not suited for vehicle tracking from UAV videos with background motion.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“[37] | To get traffic density | Motion estimation based counting | 90.45”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“[37] Ensemble model | CNN+Haar | Custom | 1000 × 300 | Different altitudes | Mostly top-view | Multiple Vehicles | -- | 97.60 | -- | --”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- tieleman, 2012, Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude, Neural Netw Mach Learning, 4, 26
- lucas, 1981, An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision, Proc IJCAI, 674
- 10.1109/CVPR.2001.990517 · DOI · Paper page
- bradski, 2000, The OpenCV Library, Dr Dobb’s J Softw Tools
- 10.1155/2017/8324301 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000646 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijtst.2016.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1145/1032222.1032229 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-7908-2604-3_16 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/IGARSS.2005.1525684 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIP.2011.2172798 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCSVT.2011.2162274 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00064-7 · DOI
- breckon, 2009, Autonomous real-time vehicle detection from a medium-level UAV, Proc 24th Int Unmanned Air Vehicle Systems Conf, 29
- gaszczak, 2011, Real-time people and vehicle detection from UAV imagery, Proc SPIE, 7878, 78780b, 10.1117/12.876663 · DOI
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570387 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00138-011-0336-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.07.014 · DOI
- 10.1109/ISC2.2015.7366230 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2016.2643005 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2005.858621 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2014.2331353 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2016.2595526 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.04.009 · DOI
- lin, 2012, Road detection from aerial imagery, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom, 3588
- 10.1109/ISC2.2017.8090811 · DOI
- kyoungah, 2009, Developing a UAV-based rapid mapping system for emergency response, Proc SPIE, 7332, 733209, 10.1117/12.818492 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACVMOT.2005.99 · DOI
- coifman, 2004, Surface transportation surveillance from unmanned aerial vehicles, Proc 83rd Annu Meeting Transp Res Board, 1
- yu, 2009, Motion pattern interpretation and detection for tracking moving vehicles in airborne video, Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit, 2671
- 10.1109/TAES.2013.120404 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2005.29 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2003.821208 · DOI
- redmon, 2016, YOLO9000 Better Faster Stronger
- 10.3141/1855-17 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.09.010 · DOI
- simonyan, 2014, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-scale Image Recognition
- 10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779606 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ke, R., Zhuang, Y., Pu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.2984197 · Cited by 240
Self-citationA Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System
Bisio, I., Garibotto, C., Haleem, H., Lavagetto, F., & Sciarrone, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207282 · Cited by 139
Jian, L., Li, Z., Yang, X., Wu, W., Ahmad, A., & Jeon, G. (2019) · IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mce.2019.2892286 · Cited by 68
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ke, R., Li, Z., Tang, J., Pan, Z., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Southeast University (CN)
- Central South University (CN)
- Northeastern University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-64
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2793872863
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 23
- FWCI
- 16.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51329801)
- Shenzhen Science and Technology Planning Project (GJHZ20150316154158400)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- UAV video, vehicle detection, ensemble classifiers, Haar cascade, convolutional neural networks, optical flow, traffic flow theory, traffic congestion, heavy traffic, unmanned aerial vehicles, traffic data collection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review