Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pixel-Level Cracking Detection on 3D Asphalt Pavement Images Through Deep-Learning- Based CrackNet-V

Fei, Yue, Wang, Kelvin C. P., Zhang, Allen, Chen, Cheng, Li, Joshua Q., Liu, Yang, Yang, Guangwei, Li, Baoxian·2020·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

A few recent developments have demonstrated that deep-learning-based solutions can outperform traditional algorithms for automated pavement crack detection. In this paper, an efficient deep network called CrackNet-V is proposed for automated pixel-level crack detection on 3D asphalt pavement images. Compared with the original CrackNet, CrackNet-V has a deeper architecture but fewer parameters, resulting in improved accuracy and computation efficiency. Inspired by CrackNet, CrackNet-V uses invariant spatial size through all layers such that supervised learning can be conducted at pixel level. Following the VGG network, CrackNet-V uses 3 × 3 size of filters for the first six convolutional layers and stacks several 3 × 3 convolutional layers together for deep abstraction, resulting in reduced number of parameters and efficient feature extraction. CrackNet-V has 64113 parameters and consists of ten layers, including one pre-process layer, eight convolutional layers, and one output layer. A new activation function leaky rectified tanh is proposed in this paper for higher accuracy in detecting shallow cracks. The training of CrackNet-V was completed after 3000 iterations, which took only one day on a GeForce GTX 1080Ti device. According to the experimental results on 500 testing images, CrackNet-V achieves a high performance with a Precision of 84.31%, Recall of 90.12%, and an F-1 score of 87.12%. It is shown that CrackNet-V yields better overall performance particularly in detecting fine cracks compared with CrackNet. The efficiency of CrackNet-V further reveals the advantages of deep learning techniques for automated pixel-level pavement crack detection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2019.2891167

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Fei, Y., Wang, K. C. P., Zhang, A., Chen, C., Li, J. Q., Liu, Y., Yang, G., & Li, B.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2020-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
273-284
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2912530595
Cited by
324
References
8
FWCI
24.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pixel-Level Cracking Detection on 3D Asphalt Pavement Images Through Deep-Learning- Based CrackNet-V. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2019.2891167
The paper
Fei, Y., Wang, K. C. P., Zhang, A., Chen, C., Li, J. Q., Liu, Y., Yang, G., & Li, B. (2020). Pixel-Level Cracking Detection on 3D Asphalt Pavement Images Through Deep-Learning- Based CrackNet-V. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2019.2891167

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.