The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pixel-Level Cracking Detection on 3D Asphalt Pavement Images Through Deep-Learning- Based CrackNet-V
Abstract
A few recent developments have demonstrated that deep-learning-based solutions can outperform traditional algorithms for automated pavement crack detection. In this paper, an efficient deep network called CrackNet-V is proposed for automated pixel-level crack detection on 3D asphalt pavement images. Compared with the original CrackNet, CrackNet-V has a deeper architecture but fewer parameters, resulting in improved accuracy and computation efficiency. Inspired by CrackNet, CrackNet-V uses invariant spatial size through all layers such that supervised learning can be conducted at pixel level. Following the VGG network, CrackNet-V uses 3 × 3 size of filters for the first six convolutional layers and stacks several 3 × 3 convolutional layers together for deep abstraction, resulting in reduced number of parameters and efficient feature extraction. CrackNet-V has 64113 parameters and consists of ten layers, including one pre-process layer, eight convolutional layers, and one output layer. A new activation function leaky rectified tanh is proposed in this paper for higher accuracy in detecting shallow cracks. The training of CrackNet-V was completed after 3000 iterations, which took only one day on a GeForce GTX 1080Ti device. According to the experimental results on 500 testing images, CrackNet-V achieves a high performance with a Precision of 84.31%, Recall of 90.12%, and an F-1 score of 87.12%. It is shown that CrackNet-V yields better overall performance particularly in detecting fine cracks compared with CrackNet. The efficiency of CrackNet-V further reveals the advantages of deep learning techniques for automated pixel-level pavement crack detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszar, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.19 · Cited by 12,696
Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net
Springenberg, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T., & Riedmiller, M. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6806 · Cited by 3,447
Going Deeper with Convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.4842 · Cited by 1,461
Cited by
Kheradmandi, N., & Mehranfar, V. (2022) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126162 · Cited by 426
Machine Learning for Crack Detection: Review and Model Performance Comparison
Hsieh, Y.-A., & Tsai, Y. J. (2020) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000918 · Cited by 420
Pavement crack detection based on transformer network
Guo, F., Qian, Y., Liu, J., & Yu, H. (2023) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104646 · Cited by 269
A cost effective solution for pavement crack inspection using cameras and deep neural networks
Mei, Q., & Gül, M. (2020) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119397 · Cited by 253
A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning-Based Crack Detection Approaches
Hamishebahar, Y., Guan, H., So, S., & Jo, J. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031374 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Fei, Y., Wang, K. C. P., Zhang, A., Chen, C., Li, J. Q., Liu, Y., Yang, G., & Li, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 273-284
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2912530595
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 24.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pixel-Level Cracking Detection on 3D Asphalt Pavement Images Through Deep-Learning- Based CrackNet-V. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2019.2891167
- The paper
- Fei, Y., Wang, K. C. P., Zhang, A., Chen, C., Li, J. Q., Liu, Y., Yang, G., & Li, B. (2020). Pixel-Level Cracking Detection on 3D Asphalt Pavement Images Through Deep-Learning- Based CrackNet-V. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2019.2891167
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.