Cited by 101Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsReinforcement Learning in Robotics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 218 of the 230 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Survey of Deep Learning Applications to Autonomous Vehicle Control

Open access
Kuutti, Sampo, Bowden, Richard, Jin, Yaochu, Barber, Phil, Fallah, Saber·2021·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Designing a controller for autonomous vehicles capable of providing adequate performance in all driving scenarios is challenging due to the highly complex environment and inability to test the system in the wide variety of scenarios which it may encounter after deployment. However, deep learning methods have shown great promise in not only providing excellent performance for complex and non-linear control problems, but also in generalising previously learned rules to new scenarios. For these reasons, the use of deep learning for vehicle control is becoming increasingly popular. Although important advancements have been achieved in this field, these works have not been fully summarised. This paper surveys a wide range of research works reported in the literature which aim to control a vehicle through deep learning methods. Although there exists overlap between control and perception, the focus of this paper is on vehicle control, rather than the wider perception problem which includes tasks such as semantic segmentation and object detection. The paper identifies the strengths and limitations of available deep learning methods through comparative analysis and discusses the research challenges in terms of computation, architecture selection, goal specification, generalisation, verification and validation, as well as safety. Overall, this survey brings timely and topical information to a rapidly evolving field relevant to intelligent transportation systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2019.2962338

Cites

218 of 218 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–218 of 218

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. ripley, 1996, Artificial Neural Networks
  2. schalkoff, 1997, Artificial Neural Networks
  3. ng, 2004, Feature selection, L1 vs. L2 regularization, and rotational invariance, Proc 21st Int Conf Mach Learn (ICML), 78
  4. 10.1126/science.153.3731.34 · DOI · Paper page
  5. barron, 2009, Parallelizing Reinforcement Learning
  6. abraham, 2017, Consumer Interest in Automation Preliminary Observations Exploring a Year’s Change
  7. knight, 2016, An Ambitious Plan to Build a Self-Driving Borg
  8. 2016, Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems—Research Theme Analysis Report
  9. 2017, Consumer Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles
  10. bosankic, 2017, How consumers’ Perception of Autonomous Cars Will Influence Their Adoption
  11. sevchuk, 2016, Hyperparameter Optimization for Neural Networks
  12. raffel, 2015, Neural Network Hyperparameters
  13. 2018, Global status report on road safety 2018
  14. 2019, Waymo open dataset An autonomous driving dataset
  15. 2018, Udacity Self-Driving Car Dataset
  16. 2018, Autonomous car development platform from nvidia drive px2
  17. williams, 1987, Reinforcement learning connectionist systems
  18. 2018, Cyclone V—Overview
  19. 2018, Evolution of the Eye
  20. 0, CarSim
  21. nguyen, 2015, Deep neural networks are easily fooled, Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR), 427
  22. 2017, 2016 road safety statistics What is behind the figures
  23. 2017, 2016 Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes Overview
  24. maurer, 2016, Autonomous Driving
  25. 2017, Research on the Impacts of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) on Traffic Flow Summary Report
  26. 2019, The Open Racing Car Simulator

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 101

Metadata

Authors
Kuutti, S., Bowden, R., Jin, Y., Barber, P., & Fallah, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Jaguar Land Rover (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2021-02
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
712-733
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2995697759
Cited by
96
References
230
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.K.-Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R512217/1)
  • Jaguar Land Rover
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, vehicle control, deep learning control, verification and validation, safety, goal specification, intelligent transportation systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review