Preserving Privacy in the Internet of Connected Vehicles
Open accessAbstract
Today's vehicles are advancing from stand-alone transportation means to vehicle-to-vehicle, and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications enabled devices which are able to exchange data through the transportation communication infrastructure. As the IoT and data remain intrinsically linked together, the fast-changing mobility landscape of intent-based networking for the Internet of connected vehicles comes with a great risk of data security and privacy violations. This paper considers the privacy issues in the distributed edge computing, in which the data is communicated between a number of vehicles in the IoT layer and potentially untrusted edge controllers at the edge of the network. The sensory data communicated by the vehicles contain sensitive information, such as location and speed, which could violate the users' privacy if they are leaked with no perturbation. Recent studies suggest mechanisms for randomizing the stream of data to ensure individuals' privacy. Although the past works on differential privacy provide a strong privacy guarantee, they are limited to applications where communication parties are trusted and/or there is no correlation between the users or the featured of sensory data. In this paper, we address this gap by proposing a differentially private data streaming system that adds a correlated noise in the vehicle's side (IoT layer) rather than the transportation infrastructure. Also, our system is able to ensure a strong privacy level over time. The pro…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[38] developed a DP data streaming system for CAV networks, addressing data correlation and dynamic network topology by implementing group-based data compression and adaptive noise addition.
“Study in [38] developed a DP data streaming system for CAV networks. It addressed the challenges of data correlation and dynamic network topology by implementing group-based data compression and adaptive noise addition.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Ghane, S., Jolfaei, A., Kulik, L., Ramamohanarao, K., & Puthal, D.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5018-5027
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W3000335297
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- privacy preservation, differential privacy, stream processing, correlated noise, edge computing, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, vehicle-to-infrastructure communication, Internet of Things, data utility, location privacy, intent-based networking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review