Mobility-Aware Proactive Edge Caching for Connected Vehicles Using Federated Learning
Open accessAbstract
Content Caching at the edge of vehicular networks has been considered as a promising technology to satisfy the increasing demands of computation-intensive and latency-sensitive vehicular applications for intelligent transportation. The existing content caching schemes, when used in vehicular networks, face two distinct challenges: 1) Vehicles connected to an edge server keep moving, making the content popularity varying and hard to predict. 2) Cached content is easily out-of-date since each connected vehicle stays in the area of an edge server for a short duration. To address these challenges, we propose a Mobility-aware Proactive edge Caching scheme based on Federated learning (MPCF). This new scheme enables multiple vehicles to collaboratively learn a global model for predicting content popularity with the private training data distributed on local vehicles. MPCF also employs a Context-aware Adversarial AutoEncoder to predict the highly dynamic content popularity. Besides, MPCF integrates a mobility-aware cache replacement policy, which allows the network edges to add/evict contents in response to the mobility patterns and preferences of vehicles. MPCF can greatly improve cache performance, effectively protect users' privacy and significantly reduce communication costs. Experimental results demonstrate that MPCF outperforms other baseline caching schemes in terms of the cache hit ratio in vehicular edge networks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Proactive caching is a more efficient approach for content distribution considering the vehicular environment's complexity and high mobility characteristics.
“Proactive caching is a more efficient approach for content distribution [149] considering the vehicular environment's complexity and high mobility characteristics.”
From Leveraging 3GPP Features and Optimization Techniques for 5G NR-V2X Resource Allocation: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [149]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 332
- Authors
- Yu, Z., Hu, J., Min, G., Zhao, Z., Miao, W., & Hossain, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- King Saud University (SA)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5341-5351
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W3049535205
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EPSRC (EP/M013936/2)
- Researchers Supporting Project (RSP-2020/32, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Keywords
- vehicular networks, connected vehicles, federated learning, content popularity prediction, cache replacement policy, adversarial autoencoder, privacy preservation, communication cost reduction, cache hit rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review