Cited by 332Caching and Content DeliveryIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)

Mobility-Aware Proactive Edge Caching for Connected Vehicles Using Federated Learning

Open access
Yu, Zhengxin, Hu, Jia, Min, Geyong, Zhao, Zhiwei, Miao, Wang, Hossain, M. Shamim·2021·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Content Caching at the edge of vehicular networks has been considered as a promising technology to satisfy the increasing demands of computation-intensive and latency-sensitive vehicular applications for intelligent transportation. The existing content caching schemes, when used in vehicular networks, face two distinct challenges: 1) Vehicles connected to an edge server keep moving, making the content popularity varying and hard to predict. 2) Cached content is easily out-of-date since each connected vehicle stays in the area of an edge server for a short duration. To address these challenges, we propose a Mobility-aware Proactive edge Caching scheme based on Federated learning (MPCF). This new scheme enables multiple vehicles to collaboratively learn a global model for predicting content popularity with the private training data distributed on local vehicles. MPCF also employs a Context-aware Adversarial AutoEncoder to predict the highly dynamic content popularity. Besides, MPCF integrates a mobility-aware cache replacement policy, which allows the network edges to add/evict contents in response to the mobility patterns and preferences of vehicles. MPCF can greatly improve cache performance, effectively protect users' privacy and significantly reduce communication costs. Experimental results demonstrate that MPCF outperforms other baseline caching schemes in terms of the cache hit ratio in vehicular edge networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2020.3017474

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proactive caching is a more efficient approach for content distribution considering the vehicular environment's complexity and high mobility characteristics.

    “Proactive caching is a more efficient approach for content distribution [149] considering the vehicular environment's complexity and high mobility characteristics.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 332

Authors
Yu, Z., Hu, J., Min, G., Zhao, Z., Miao, W., & Hossain, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • King Saud University (SA)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2021-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
5341-5351
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W3049535205
Cited by
332
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 4
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EPSRC (EP/M013936/2)
  • Researchers Supporting Project (RSP-2020/32, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Keywords
vehicular networks, connected vehicles, federated learning, content popularity prediction, cache replacement policy, adversarial autoencoder, privacy preservation, communication cost reduction, cache hit rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review