A Multi-Agent Driving Simulation Approach for Evaluating the Safety Benefits of Connected Vehicles
Abstract
The in-vehicle warning information provided in the CVs environment allow the driver to respond rapidly to upcoming hazardous situations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety benefits due to the provision of warning information by analyzing vehicle interactions that are defined as the behavior change of the subject vehicle and the preceding vehicle. A notable feature of this study is the use of a multi-agent driving simulation (MADS) method to analyze the vehicle interaction with various vehicle pairs that are composed of the connected vehicle (CV) capable of receiving warning information and the regular vehicle (RV) that does not receive warning information. A total of four scenarios representing different vehicle pairs, which include CV-RV, RV-CV, CV-CV, and RV-RV, are evaluated in this study. The proposed analysis consists of four parts: the characteristics of subject vehicle maneuvering, variation of relative speed, evasive maneuvering by lane change, and overall crash potential. As an example, the result of analyzing crash potential index (CPI) showed that the greatest safety benefits were obtained with the CV-CV case among aforementioned four vehicle pairs. Approximately 45% of CPI reduction was achievable with the CV-CV case, compared to the RV-RV case. In addition to the CPI, useful findings obtained by investigating safety indicators for each vehicle pair are discussed in terms of safety benefits. The results of this study are expected to be used f…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Longitudinal indicators can be interpreted as increasing accident probability with higher values.
“Longitudinal indicators can be interpreted as increasing accident probability with higher values [56].”
From Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic
Kim, H., Ko, J., Oh, C., & Kim, S. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229672 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ko, J., Jang, J., & Oh, C.
- Affiliations
- Hanyang University (KR)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 4512-4524
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W3118793905
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Transportation and Logistics Research Program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean Government (20TLRP-B148659-03)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- connected vehicles, vehicle interaction, lane changing, evasive maneuvers, relative speed, safety benefits, driver behavior change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review