Cited by 64Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingTraffic control and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Load Balance Guaranteed Vehicle-to-Vehicle Computation Offloading for Min-Max Fairness in VANETs

Wu, Yalan, Wu, Jigang, Chen, Long, Yan, Jiaquan, Han, Yinhe·2022·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Load balance in vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) is a challenge in vehicle-to-vehicle computation offloading, due to stochastic requests of users, heterogeneous service capabilities and high mobility of vehicles, etc. This paper aims to fill this gap by formulating a problem for load balance in a VANET, with the objective of minimizing the maximum load under transmit power, storage capacity, per task completion time and energy consumption constraints. The formulated problem is proved to be NP-hard, then it is investigated by decomposing it into two subproblems, i.e., how to offload tasks for the case of fixed transmit power and how to adjust transmit power for the given offloading decision. For the first subproblem, an approximation algorithm is proposed by offloading the tasks in the vehicle with the maximum load to the vehicle with minimum load. Meanwhile, a deep reinforcement learning algorithm is proposed, in order to focus on the network dynamics. A coalition based algorithm, a distributed coalition based algorithm, as well as an incentive algorithm based on deep reinforcement learning, are proposed to maximize the total payoff for the selfishness of vehicles. For the second subproblem, an adjustment strategy for transmit power is customized to further reduce the computing load. The algorithms are evaluated on an integrated simulation platform with open street map, SUMO, NS-3 and dataset of Google cluster-usage traces. Simulation results show that, the proposed algorithms outperform three state-of-the-art works for most cases, in terms of the maximum load. The proposed distributed algorithm can significantly accelerate the proposed centralized algorithm with acceptable increase in maximum load. Besides, the load can be further reduced by the proposed adjustment strategy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2021.3109154

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1109/TITS.2018.2795381 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/MNET.2015.7018198 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TITS.2017.2749459 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TVT.2018.2833427 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2895593 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TMC.2020.3025116 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TITS.2020.2971343 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TCC.2017.2786738 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s11276-018-1735-y · DOI
  10. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2871251 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TGCN.2018.2837618 · DOI
  12. 2020, Annual European Union Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2018 and Inventory Report 2020
  13. 2016, Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility
  14. 10.1109/INFOCOM.2019.8737464 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2823000 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/INFOCOM.2016.7524494 · DOI
  17. Sutton, 2018, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
  18. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2894851 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TMC.2019.2918773 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TITS.2020.2990462 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2997720 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TVT.2020.2970763 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2876298 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.02.008 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.07.006 · DOI
  26. 10.1155/2018/6421607 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/TWC.2018.2819648 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/TBC.2019.2906783 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TWC.2017.2717986 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2917890 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/WCNC.2018.8377343 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1109/TCOMM.2017.2699660 · DOI
  33. Kleinberg, 2006, Algorithm Design
  34. Schaul, Prioritized experience replay, 1
  35. Watkins, 1992, Q-learning, Mach. Learn., 8, 279, 10.1007/BF00992698 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1109/VTCFall.2018.8690980 · DOI
  37. Osborne, 1994, A Course in Game Theory
  38. 10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2908152 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/APCC.2016.7581471 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Y., Wu, J., Chen, L., Yan, J., & Han, Y.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2022-08
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
11994-12013
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W3201425084
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1003201)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62072118, 62106052)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
vehicular ad hoc networks, load balancing, max-min fairness, transmit power adjustment, deep reinforcement learning, incentive mechanisms, energy consumption constraints, task completion time, NP-hardness, approximation algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review