Solving Vehicle Routing Problem Using Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Open accessAbstract
Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) are a critical component of Industry 4.0 and 5.0, particularly having applications in logistic management. One of their crucial utilization is in supply-chain management and scheduling for optimally routing transportation of goods by vehicles at a given set of locations. This paper discusses the broader problem of vehicle traffic management, more popularly known as the Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP), and investigates the possible use of near-term quantum devices for solving it. For this purpose, we give the Ising formulation for VRP and some of its constrained variants. Then, we present a detailed procedure to solve VRP by minimizing its corresponding Ising Hamiltonian using a hybrid quantum-classical heuristic called Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), implemented on the IBM Qiskit platform. We compare the performance of QAOA with classical solvers such as CPLEX on problem instances of up to 15 qubits. We find that performance of QAOA has a multifaceted dependence on the classical optimization routine used, the depth of the ansatz parameterized by$p$, initialization of variational parameters, and problem instance itself.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is presented by Azad et al. for solving the vehicle routing problem.
“The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is presented by Azad et al. [74] for solving the vehicle routing problem.”
From Vehicle-to-Everything Communication in Intelligent Connected Vehicles: A Survey and Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Various optimization algorithms such as the improved ant colony algorithm using congestion avoidance (IACA CAA), quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), and strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA) are introduced to account for real-time changes in traffic conditions.
“To account for real-time changes in traffic conditions, various optimization algorithms such as the improved ant colony algorithm using congestion avoidance (IACA CAA ) [86], quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) [74], and strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA) [87] are introduced.”
From Vehicle-to-Everything Communication in Intelligent Connected Vehicles: A Survey and Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Azad, U., Behera, B. K., Ahmed, E. A., Panigrahi, P. K., & Farouk, A.
- Affiliations
- International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad (IN)
- Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata (IN)
- South Valley University (EG)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 7564-7573
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W3004467008
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- vehicle routing, quantum approximate optimization algorithm, hybrid quantum-classical optimization, IBM Qiskit, CPLEX comparison, logistics optimization, supply chain management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review