AI-Empowered Trajectory Anomaly Detection for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Hierarchical Federated Learning Approach
Abstract
The vigorous development of positioning technology and ubiquitous computing has spawned trajectory big data. By analyzing and processing the trajectory big data in the form of data streams in a timely and effective manner, anomalies hidden in the trajectory data can be found, thus serving urban planning, traffic management, safety control and other applications. Limited by the inherent uncertainty, infinity, time-varying evolution, sparsity and skewed distribution of trajectory big data, traditional anomaly detection techniques cannot be directly applied to anomaly detection in trajectory big data. To solve this problem, we propose a hierarchical trajectory anomaly detection scheme for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) using both machine learning and blockchain technologies. To be specific, a hierarchical federated learning strategy is proposed to improve the generalization ability of the global trajectory anomaly detection model by secondary fusion of the multi-area trajectory anomaly detection model. Then, by integrating blockchain and federated learning, the iterative exchange and fusion of the global trajectory anomaly detection model can be realized by means of on-chain and off-chain coordinated data access. Experiments show that the proposed scheme can improve the generalization ability of the trajectory anomaly detection model in different areas, while ensuring its reliability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI algorithms can analyze transaction data to identify fraudulent activities, such as false claims of lost property or overcharging customers, helping taxi companies reduce losses and improve customer trust.
“AI algorithms can analyze transaction data to identify fraudulent activities, such as false claims of lost property or overcharging customers. This can help taxi companies reduce losses and improve customer trust [131] .”
From Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review (2023) · cites this paper as [131]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review
Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023) · Cognitive Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, X., Liu, W., Lin, H., Hu, J., Kaur, K., & Hossain, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Fujian Normal University (CN)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
- King Saud University (SA)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4631-4640
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W4312660387
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- Espace ÉTS (ETS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, through the Researchers Supporting Project (RSP2023R32)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Data Management and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- trajectory anomaly detection, intelligent transportation systems, hierarchical federated learning, blockchain, data streams, model generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review