The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation—A Methodological Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Autonomous driving systems have witnessed significant development during the past years thanks to the advance in machine learning-enabled sensing and decision-making algorithms. One critical challenge for their massive deployment in the real world is their safety evaluation. Most existing driving systems are still trained and evaluated on naturalistic scenarios collected from daily life or heuristically-generated adversarial ones. However, the large population of cars, in general, leads to an extremely low collision rate, indicating that safety-critical scenarios are rare in the collected real-world data. Thus, methods to artificially generate scenarios become crucial to measure the risk and reduce the cost. In this survey, we focus on the algorithms of safety-critical scenario generation in autonomous driving. We first provide a comprehensive taxonomy of existing algorithms by dividing them into three categories: data-driven generation, adversarial generation, and knowledge-based generation. Then, we discuss useful tools for scenario generation, including simulation platforms and packages. Finally, we extend our discussion to five main challenges of current works– fidelity, efficiency, diversity, transferability, controllability– and research opportunities lighted up by these challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Labaca-Castro, R. (2023) · Machine Learning under Malware Attack · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40442-0_9 · Cited by 19,272
The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding
Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., & Schiele, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.350 · Cited by 12,433
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02971 · Cited by 10,782
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625
Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6572 · Cited by 10,381
Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., & Urtasun, R. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913491297 · Cited by 9,913
Cited by
Foundation models in robotics: Applications, challenges, and the future
Firoozi, R., Tucker, J., Tian, S., Majumdar, A., Sun, J., Liu, W., Zhu, Y., Song, S., Kapoor, A., Hausman, K., et al. (2025) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783649241281508 · Cited by 238
Xu, Z., Zheng, N., Fang, Y., & Vu, H. L. (2025) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2025.105367 · Cited by 6
The Flexcrash Platform for Testing Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed-Traffic Scenarios
Gambi, A., Mathews, S., Steininger, B., Poienko, M., & Bobek, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the 33rd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis · doi:10.1145/3650212.3685299 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, W., Xu, C., Arief, M., Lin, H., Li, B., & Zhao, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 6971-6988
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W4361861254
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 163
- FWCI
- 19.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation—A Methodological Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2023.3259322
- The paper
- Ding, W., Xu, C., Arief, M., Lin, H., Li, B., & Zhao, D. (2023). A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation—A Methodological Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2023.3259322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
