The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CAIM discretization algorithm
Abstract
The task of extracting knowledge from databases is quite often performed by machine learning algorithms. The majority of these algorithms can be applied only to data described by discrete numerical or nominal attributes (features). In the case of continuous attributes, there is a need for a discretization algorithm that transforms continuous attributes into discrete ones. We describe such an algorithm, called CAIM (class-attribute interdependence maximization), which is designed to work with supervised data. The goal of the CAIM algorithm is to maximize the class-attribute interdependence and to generate a (possibly) minimal number of discrete intervals. The algorithm does not require the user to predefine the number of intervals, as opposed to some other discretization algorithms. The tests performed using CAIM and six other state-of-the-art discretization algorithms show that discrete attributes generated by the CAIM algorithm almost always have the lowest number of intervals and the highest class-attribute interdependency. Two machine learning algorithms, the CLIP4 rule algorithm and the decision tree algorithm, are used to generate classification rules from data discretized by CAIM. For both the CLIP4 and decision tree algorithms, the accuracy of the generated rules is higher and the number of the rules is lower for data discretized using the CAIM algorithm when compared to data discretized using six other discretization algorithms. The highest classification accuracy was achieved for data sets discretized with the CAIM algorithm, as compared with the other six algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Algorithm for Vector Quantizer Design
Linde, Y., Buzo, A., & Gray, R. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1980.1094577 · Cited by 7,201
Cited by
A Survey of Discretization Techniques: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis in Supervised Learning
Garcia, S., Luengo, J., Sáez, J. A., López, V., & Herrera, F. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2012.35 · Cited by 548
A review of epileptic seizure detection using machine learning classifiers
Siddiqui, M. K., Morales-Menendez, R., Huang, X., & Hussain, N. (2020) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-020-00105-1 · Cited by 432
Tutorial on practical tips of the most influential data preprocessing algorithms in data mining
García, S., Luengo, J., & Herrera, F. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.006 · Cited by 310
Data preprocessing in predictive data mining
Alexandropoulos, S.-A. N., Kotsiantis, S. B., & Vrahatis, M. N. (2019) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s026988891800036x · Cited by 209
An effective hybrid learning system for telecommunication churn prediction
Huang, Y., & Kechadi, T. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.020 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurgan, L. A., & Cios, K. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-153
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170595610
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CAIM discretization algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2004.1269594
- The paper
- Kurgan, L. A., & Cios, K. J. (2004). CAIM discretization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2004.1269594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.