The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unifying framework for detecting outliers and change points from time series
Abstract
We are concerned with the issue of detecting outliers and change points from time series. In the area of data mining, there have been increased interest in these issues since outlier detection is related to fraud detection, rare event discovery, etc., while change-point detection is related to event/trend change detection, activity monitoring, etc. Although, in most previous work, outlier detection and change point detection have not been related explicitly, this paper presents a unifying framework for dealing with both of them. In this framework, a probabilistic model of time series is incrementally learned using an online discounting learning algorithm, which can track a drifting data source adaptively by forgetting out-of-date statistics gradually. A score for any given data is calculated in terms of its deviation from the learned model, with a higher score indicating a high possibility of being an outlier. By taking an average of the scores over a window of a fixed length and sliding the window, we may obtain a new time series consisting of moving-averaged scores. Change point detection is then reduced to the issue of detecting outliers in that time series. We compare the performance of our framework with those of conventional methods to demonstrate its validity through simulation and experimental applications to incidents detection in network security.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A View of the Em Algorithm that Justifies Incremental, Sparse, and other Variants
Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998) · Learning in Graphical Models · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_12 · Cited by 2,187
Point Estimation of the Parameters of Piecewise Regression Models
Hawkins, D. M. (1976) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346519 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Deep learning in video multi-object tracking: A survey
Ciaparrone, G., Luque Sánchez, F., Tabik, S., Troiano, L., Tagliaferri, R., & Herrera, F. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.023 · Cited by 665
Banerjee, S., Bhandary, P., Woodhouse, M., Sen, T. Z., Wise, R. P., & Andorf, C. M. (2021) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-021-04120-9 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Takeuchi, J., & Yamanishi, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 482-492
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4238201623
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unifying framework for detecting outliers and change points from time series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2006.1599387
- The paper
- Takeuchi, J., & Yamanishi, K. (2006). A unifying framework for detecting outliers and change points from time series. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2006.1599387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.