The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combating the Small Sample Class Imbalance Problem Using Feature Selection
Abstract
The class imbalance problem is encountered in real-world applications of machine learning and results in a classifier's suboptimal performance. Researchers have rigorously studied the resampling, algorithms, and feature selection approaches to this problem. No systematic studies have been conducted to understand how well these methods combat the class imbalance problem and which of these methods best manage the different challenges posed by imbalanced data sets. In particular, feature selection has rarely been studied outside of text classification problems. Additionally, no studies have looked at the additional problem of learning from small samples. This paper presents a first systematic comparison of the three types of methods developed for imbalanced data classification problems and of seven feature selection metrics evaluated on small sample data sets from different applications. We evaluated the performance of these metrics using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) and area under the precision-recall curve (PRC). We compared each metric on the average performance across all problems and on the likelihood of a metric yielding the best performance on a specific problem. We examined the performance of these metrics inside each problem domain. Finally, we evaluated the efficacy of these metrics to see which perform best across algorithms. Our results showed that signal-to-noise correlation coefficient (S2N) and Feature Assessment by Sliding Thresholds (FAST) are great candidates for feature selection in most applications, especially when selecting very small numbers of features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Mining with rarity: a unifying framework
Weiss, G. M. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007734 · Cited by 1,393
An Introduction to Machine Learning
Kubat, M. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63913-0 · Cited by 445
Cited by
Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications
Haixiang, G., Yijing, L., Shang, J., Mingyun, G., Yuanyue, H., & Bing, G. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.035 · Cited by 2,377
A Survey of Predictive Modeling on Imbalanced Domains
Branco, P., Torgo, L., & Ribeiro, R. P. (2017) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2907070 · Cited by 1,129
Feature selection methods for big data bioinformatics: A survey from the search perspective
Wang, L., Wang, Y., & Chang, Q. (2016) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.08.014 · Cited by 331
On the use of MapReduce for imbalanced big data using Random Forest
del Río, S., López, V., Benítez, J. M., & Herrera, F. (2014) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.043 · Cited by 328
Machine-learning-based patient-specific prediction models for knee osteoarthritis
Jamshidi, A., Pelletier, J.-P., & Martel-Pelletier, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-018-0130-5 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Wasikowski, M., & Chen, X.-W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1388-1400
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138776277
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combating the Small Sample Class Imbalance Problem Using Feature Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2009.187
- The paper
- Wasikowski, M., & Chen, X.-W. (2010). Combating the Small Sample Class Imbalance Problem Using Feature Selection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2009.187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.