The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature Selection via Global Redundancy Minimization
Abstract
Feature selection has been an important research topic in data mining, because the real data sets often have high-dimensional features, such as the bioinformatics and text mining applications. Many existing filter feature selection methods rank features by optimizing certain feature ranking criterions, such that correlated features often have similar rankings. These correlated features are redundant and don't provide large mutual information to help data mining. Thus, when we select a limited number of features, we hope to select the top non-redundant features such that the useful mutual information can be maximized. In previous research, Ding et al. recognized this important issue and proposed the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance Feature Selection (mRMR) model to minimize the redundancy between sequentially selected features. However, this method used the greedy search, thus the global feature redundancy wasn't considered and the results are not optimal. In this paper, we propose a new feature selection framework to globally minimize the feature redundancy with maximizing the given feature ranking scores, which can come from any supervised or unsupervised methods. Our new model has no parameter so that it is especially suitable for practical data mining application. Experimental results on benchmark data sets show that the proposed method consistently improves the feature selection results compared to the original methods. Meanwhile, we introduce a new unsupervised global and local discriminative feature selection method which can be unified with the global feature redundancy minimization framework and shows superior performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
Khan, J., Wei, J. S., Ringnér, M., Saal, L. H., Ladanyi, M., Westermann, F., Berthold, F., Schwab, M., Antonescu, C. R., Peterson, C., et al. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/89044 · Cited by 2,644
Cited by
Feature selection methods for big data bioinformatics: A survey from the search perspective
Wang, L., Wang, Y., & Chang, Q. (2016) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.08.014 · Cited by 331
Feature selection with multi-view data: A survey
Zhang, R., Nie, F., Li, X., & Wei, X. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.11.019 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Nie, F., & Huang, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2015-10-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2743-2755
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1575192016
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature Selection via Global Redundancy Minimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2015.2426703
- The paper
- Wang, D., Nie, F., & Huang, H. (2015). Feature Selection via Global Redundancy Minimization. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2015.2426703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.