Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Position-Transitional Particle Swarm Optimization-Incorporated Latent Factor Analysis

Luo, Xin, Yuan, Ye, Chen, Sili, Zeng, Nianyin, Wang, Zidong·2022·IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Abstract

High-dimensional and sparse (HiDS) matrices are frequently found in various industrial applications. A latent factor analysis (LFA) model is commonly adopted to extract useful knowledge from an HiDS matrix, whose parameter training mostly relies on a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm. However, an SGD-based LFA model's learning rate is hard to tune in real applications, making it vital to implement its self-adaptation. To address this critical issue, this study firstly investigates the evolution process of a particle swarm optimization algorithm with care, and then proposes to incorporate more dynamic information into it for avoiding accuracy loss caused by premature convergence without extra computation burden, thereby innovatively achieving a novel position-transitional particle swarm optimization (P2SO) algorithm. It is subsequently adopted to implement a P2SO-based LFA (PLFA) model that builds a learning rate swarm applied to the same group of LFs. Thus, a PLFA model implements highly efficient learning rate adaptation as well as represents an HiDS matrix precisely. Experimental results on four HiDS matrices emerging from real applications demonstrate that compared with an SGD-based LFA model, a PLFA model no longer suffers from a tedious and expensive tuning process of its learning rate, and it can achieve even higher prediction accuracy for missing data of an HiDS matrix. On the other hand, compared with state-of-the-art adaptive LFA models, a PLFA model's prediction accuracy and computational efficiency are highly competitive. Hence, it has high potential in addressing real industrial issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tkde.2020.3033324

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Luo, X., Yuan, Y., Chen, S., Zeng, N., & Wang, Z.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2022-08-01
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
3958-3970
ISSN
  • 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2191
  • 2326-3865
OpenAlex
W3094071795
Cited by
264
References
63
FWCI
15.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Position-Transitional Particle Swarm Optimization-Incorporated Latent Factor Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2020.3033324
The paper
Luo, X., Yuan, Y., Chen, S., Zeng, N., & Wang, Z. (2022). Position-Transitional Particle Swarm Optimization-Incorporated Latent Factor Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2020.3033324

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.