Cited by 64Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataMachine Learning and Data ClassificationStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

A survey for federated learning evaluations: Goals and measures

Open access
Chai, Di, Wang, Leye, Yang, Liu, Zhang, Junxue, Chen, Kai, Yang, Qiang·2024·IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Abstract

Evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing how well a system achieves its intended purpose. Federated learning (FL) is a novel paradigm for privacy-preserving machine learning that allows multiple parties to collaboratively train models without sharing sensitive data. However, evaluating FL is challenging due to its interdisciplinary nature and diverse goals, such as utility, efficiency, and security. In this survey, we first review the major evaluation goals adopted in the existing studies and then explore the evaluation metrics used for each goal. We also introduceFedEval, an open-source platform that provides a standardized and comprehensive evaluation framework for FL algorithms in terms of their utility, efficiency, and security. Finally, we discuss several challenges and future research directions for FL evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tkde.2024.3382002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 118 · Cited by 64

Authors
Chai, D., Wang, L., Yang, L., Zhang, J., Chen, K., & Yang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2024-10
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
5007-5024
ISSN
  • 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2191
  • 2326-3865
OpenAlex
W4393241167
Cited by
64
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2021B0101400001)
  • Hong Kong (RGC TRS T41-603/20R)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA0101100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
federated learning, evaluation metrics, evaluation goals, privacy-preserving machine learning, utility, efficiency, security (computing)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review