Legacy Web Application Modernization by Generating a REST Service Layer
Abstract
Web 2.0 phenomenon, REST services and growing mobile service consumption, among other factors, are leading the development of web applications to a new paradigm, named cross-device web application. Those web sites let organizations of all sizes provide a pervasive and contextual access to their information and services, to customers, employees and partners via potentially any kind of device. Most organizations often possess legacy systems that should face an ongoing evolution process to enhance its accessibility and interoperability. Yesterday they had to evolve to provide the user with a Web layer, and now they should evolve again to adapt to the new ways of data and services consumption on the Web. In such scenario, REST services play a key role, defining the interaction layer between the legacy system and all its heterogeneous front ends. This work presents a model-driven approach to derive a REST service layer from a legacy web application within the frame defined by a modernization process. This approach departs from a conceptual model of the legacy application generated by reverse engineering techniques. In this work we detail the generation process and provide a sample implementation instrumenting one of the studied web development frameworks to evaluate the suitability of the approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The authors could not compare against mppSMT, Tree2Tree, and Sharpen due to lack of tool/artifact availability.
“We also considered other approaches (mppSMT[57], Tree2Tree[29], and Sharpen[18]) but could not compare against them due to lack of tool/artifact availability ( §5).”
From Lost in Translation: A Study of Bugs Introduced by Large Language Models while Translating Code (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lost in Translation: A Study of Bugs Introduced by Large Language Models while Translating Code
Pan, R., Ibrahimzada, A. R., Krishna, R., Sankar, D., Wassi, L. P., Merler, M., Sobolev, B., Pavuluri, R., Sinha, S., & Jabbarvand, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3597503.3639226 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Can Emulating Semantic Translation Help LLMs with Code Translation? A Study Based on Pseudocode
Chen, S., Xu, C., Chen, J., Cao, J., Wu, J., & Cheung, S.-C. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3790101 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Echeverria, R. R., Macias, F., Pavon, V. M., Conejero, J. M., & Figueroa, F. S.
- Affiliations
- Univ. Extremadura, Caceres, Spain
- Venue
- IEEE Latin America Transactions
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2379-2383
- ISSN
- 1548-0992 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1668361173
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Latin America Transactions (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- legacy system modernization, REST services, web application modernization, model-driven engineering, reverse engineering, web application framework, interoperability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review