An early feedback prediction system for learners at-risk within a first-year higher education course
Abstract
Identifying at-risk students as soon as possible is a challenge in educational institutions. Decreasing the time lag between identification and real at-risk state may significantly reduce the risk of failure or disengage. In small courses, their identification is relatively easy, but it is impractical on larger ones. Current Learning Management Systems store a large amount of data that could help to generate predictive models to early identification of students in online and blended learning. The contribution of this paper is twofold: First, a new adaptive predictive model is presented based only on students' grades specifically trained for each course. A deep analysis is performed in the whole institution to evaluate its performance accuracy. Second, an early warning system is developed, focusing on dashboards visualization for stakeholders (i.e., students and teachers) and an early feedback prediction system to intervene in the case of at-risk identification. The early warning system has been evaluated in a case study on a first-year undergraduate course in computer science. We show the accuracy of the correct identification of at-risk students, the students' appraisal, and the most common factors that lead to at-risk level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methods used to support feedback include predictive modelling, classification, clustering, Bayesian network analysis, natural language processing, process mining, relationship mining, support vector machine, discovery model, machine learning, and neural network.
“Methods used to support feedback include predictive modelling (Azcona et al., 2019; Tempelaar et al., 2015), classifi cation (Baneres et al., 2019), clustering (Lim, Gasevic, et al., 2021; Tempelaar et al., 2018; Tsai et al., 2021), Bayesian network analysis (Choi & Cho, 2020), natural language processing (Perikos et al., 2017), process mining (Sedrakyan et al., 2016), relationship mining (T”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Baneres et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Baneres, D., Rodriguez, M. E., & Serra, M.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-263
- ISSN
- 1939-1382 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2942204351
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 17.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Spanish Government (TIN2016-75944-R)
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (2018NG001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- at-risk students, early warning systems, student dropout prediction, first-year students, student grades, virtual learning environments, dashboards, early feedback, student engagement, computer science education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review