Cited by 128Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Education

An early feedback prediction system for learners at-risk within a first-year higher education course

Baneres, David, Rodriguez, M. Elena, Serra, Montse·2019·IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

Abstract

Identifying at-risk students as soon as possible is a challenge in educational institutions. Decreasing the time lag between identification and real at-risk state may significantly reduce the risk of failure or disengage. In small courses, their identification is relatively easy, but it is impractical on larger ones. Current Learning Management Systems store a large amount of data that could help to generate predictive models to early identification of students in online and blended learning. The contribution of this paper is twofold: First, a new adaptive predictive model is presented based only on students' grades specifically trained for each course. A deep analysis is performed in the whole institution to evaluate its performance accuracy. Second, an early warning system is developed, focusing on dashboards visualization for stakeholders (i.e., students and teachers) and an early feedback prediction system to intervene in the case of at-risk identification. The early warning system has been evaluated in a case study on a first-year undergraduate course in computer science. We show the accuracy of the correct identification of at-risk students, the students' appraisal, and the most common factors that lead to at-risk level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tlt.2019.2912167

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods used to support feedback include predictive modelling, classification, clustering, Bayesian network analysis, natural language processing, process mining, relationship mining, support vector machine, discovery model, machine learning, and neural network.

    “Methods used to support feedback include predictive modelling (Azcona et al., 2019; Tempelaar et al., 2015), classifi­ cation (Baneres et al., 2019), clustering (Lim, Gasevic, et al., 2021; Tempelaar et al., 2018; Tsai et al., 2021), Bayesian network analysis (Choi & Cho, 2020), natural language processing (Perikos et al., 2017), process mining (Sedrakyan et al., 2016), relationship mining (T”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 128

Authors
Baneres, D., Rodriguez, M. E., & Serra, M.
Affiliations
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
249-263
ISSN
  • 1939-1382 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-0050
OpenAlex
W2942204351
Cited by
128
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3
FWCI
17.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Spanish Government (TIN2016-75944-R)
  • Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (2018NG001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
at-risk students, early warning systems, student dropout prediction, first-year students, student grades, virtual learning environments, dashboards, early feedback, student engagement, computer science education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review