The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Feasibility of Magnetic Recording at 10 Terabits Per Square Inch on Conventional Media
Abstract
This paper proposes a new approach to magnetic recording based on shingled writing and two-dimensional readback and signal-processing. This approach continues the use of conventional granular media but proposes techniques such that a substantial fraction of one bit of information is stored on each grain. Theoretically, areal-densities of the order of 10 Terabits per square inch may be achievable. In this paper we examine the feasibility of this two-dimensional magnetic recording (TDMR) and identify the significant challenges that must be overcome to achieve this vision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flipping bits in memory without accessing them: An experimental study of DRAM disturbance errors
Kim, Y., Daly, R., Kim, J., Fallin, C., Lee, J. H., Lee, D., Wilkerson, C., Lai, K., & Mutlu, O. (2014) · 2014 ACM/IEEE 41st International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) · doi:10.1109/isca.2014.6853210 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, R., Williams, M., Kavcic, A., & Miles, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 917-923
- ISSN
- 0018-9464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158477630
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Feasibility of Magnetic Recording at 10 Terabits Per Square Inch on Conventional Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmag.2008.2010676
- The paper
- Wood, R., Williams, M., Kavcic, A., & Miles, J. (2009). The Feasibility of Magnetic Recording at 10 Terabits Per Square Inch on Conventional Media. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2008.2010676
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
