The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Multilevel Cell STT-MRAM-Based Computing In-Memory Accelerator for Binary Convolutional Neural Network
Abstract
Due to additive operation’s dominated computation and simplified network in binary convolutional neural network (BCNN), it is promising for Internet of Things scenarios which demand ultralow power consumption. By means of fully exploiting the in-memory computing advantages and low current consumption design using multilevel cell (MLC) spin-toque transfer magnetic random access memory (STT-MRAM), this paper proposes an MLC-STT-computing in-memory-based computing in-memory architecture to achieve convolutional operation for BCNN to further reduce the power consumption. Simulation results show that compared with the resistive random access memory (RRAM)- and spin orbit torque-STT-MRAM-based counterparts, the architecture proposed in this paper reduces power consumption by ~$35{\times}$and 59% in Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology data set, respectively.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recently, hardware accelerators such as NVIDIA's Tensor Core and CIM (Compute-in-memory) devices have launched for 4-bit processing to improve the power efficiency [6, 7].”
From PQK: Model Compression via Pruning, Quantization, and Knowledge Distillation (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1145/1555815.1555758 · DOI
- 10.1109/ASPDAC.2017.7858419 · DOI
- 10.1109/MICRO.2007.33 · DOI
- 10.1109/TED.2011.2182053 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCAD.2012.2185930 · DOI
- 10.1145/2333660.2333664 · DOI
- jain, 2017, Computing in memory with spin-transfer torque magnetic RAM
- 10.1145/2429384.2429498 · DOI
- courbariaux, 2016, Binarized neural networks Training deep neural networks with weights and activations constrained to +1 or ?1
- 10.1109/ASPDAC.2018.8297291 · DOI
- rastegari, 2016, Xnor-net Imagenet classification using binary convolutional neural networks
Cited by
Sorted by citations
PQK: Model Compression via Pruning, Quantization, and Knowledge Distillation
Kim, J., Chang, S., & Kwak, N. (2021) · Interspeech 2021 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-248 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, Y., Ouyang, P., Zhao, Y., Kang, W., Yin, S., Zhang, Y., Zhao, W., & Wei, S.
- Affiliations
- Beihang University (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 0018-9464 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0069
- OpenAlex
- W2812853021
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Magnetic properties of thin films
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
- Keywords
- spin-transfer torque memory, in-memory computing, binary convolutional neural networks, energy-efficient computing, Internet of Things, energy consumption reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review