The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cooperative Spectrum Sharing: A Contract-Based Approach
Abstract
Providing economic incentives to all parties involved is essential for the success of dynamic spectrum access. Cooperative spectrum sharing is one effective way to achieve this, where secondary users (SUs) relay traffics for primary users (PUs) in exchange for dedicated spectrum access time for SUs' own communications. In this paper, we study the cooperative spectrum sharing under incomplete information, where SUs' wireless characteristics are private information and not known by a PU. We model the PU-SU interaction as a labor market using contract theory. In contract theory, the employer generally does not completely know employees' private information before the employment and needs to offers employees a contract under incomplete information. In our problem, the PU and SUs are, respectively, the employer and employees, and the contract consists of a set of items representing combinations of spectrum accessing time (i.e., reward) and relaying power (i.e., contribution). We study the optimal contract design for both weakly and strongly incomplete information scenarios. In the weakly incomplete information scenario, we show that the PU will optimally hire the most efficient SUs and the PU achieves the same maximum utility as in the complete information benchmark. In the strongly incomplete information scenario, however, the PU may conservatively hire less efficient SUs as well. We further propose a decompose-and-compare (DC) approximate algorithm that achieves a close-to-optimal contract. We further show that the PU's average utility loss due to the suboptimal DC algorithm and the strongly incomplete information are relatively small (less than 2 and 1.3 percent, respectively, in our numerical results with two SU types).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey
Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W.-Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001 · Cited by 6,356
Cited by
Peng, M., Sun, Y., Li, X., Mao, Z., & Wang, C. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2548658 · Cited by 386
Contract-Based Incentive Mechanisms for Device-to-Device Communications in Cellular Networks
Zhang, Y., Song, L., Saad, W., Dawy, Z., & Han, Z. (2015) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2015.2435356 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Duan, L., Gao, L., & Huang, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-187
- ISSN
- 1536-1233 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0660
- 2161-9875
- OpenAlex
- W1980889765
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.