Cited by 118Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Security in Wireless Sensor NetworksMobile Ad Hoc Networks

Multi-channel based Sybil attack detection in vehicular ad hoc networks using RSSI

Yao, Yuan, Xiao, Bin, Wu, Gaofei, Liu, Xue, Yu, Zhiwen, Zhang, Kailong, Zhou, Xingshe·2019·IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing

Abstract

Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) bring many benefits and conveniences to road safety and drive comfort in future transportation systems. However, VANETs suffer from almost all security issues as same as wireless networks. Sybil attack is one of the most risky threats since it violates the fundamental assumption of VANETs-based applications that all received information are correct and trusted. Sybil attacker can generate multiple fake identities to disseminate false messages. In this paper, we propose a novel Sybil attack detection method based on Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), Voiceprint, to conduct a widely applicable, lightweight and full-distributed detection for VANETs. Unlike most of previous RSSI-based methods that compute the absolute position or relative distance according to RSSI values, or make statistic testing based on RSSI distributions, Voiceprint adopts RSSI time series as the vehicular speech and compares the similarity among all received series. Voiceprint does not rely on any predefined radio propagation model, and conducts independent detection without support of the centralized node. Moreover, we improve Voiceprint by allowing it to conduct detection on Service Channel (SCH) to shorten observation time. Furthermore, we extend Voiceprint with change-points detection to identify those illegitimate nodes performing power control. Extensive simulations and real-world experiments demonstrate that Voiceprint is an effective method considering the cost, complexity, and performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmc.2018.2833849

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 118

Authors
Yao, Y., Xiao, B., Wu, G., Liu, X., Yu, Z., Zhang, K., & Zhou, X.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Published
2019-02-01
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
362-375
ISSN
  • 1536-1233 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0660
  • 2161-9875
OpenAlex
W2800112063
Cited by
118
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61502394, 61772446, 61572403, 61751208)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1001900)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3102017OQD097)
  • HK PolyU G-UACH
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Keywords
Sybil attack detection, vehicular ad hoc networks, received signal strength indicator, voiceprint, multichannel detection, service channels, change point detection, power control, distributed detection, network security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review