The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Scheduling for Stochastic Edge-Cloud Computing Environments Using A3C Learning and Residual Recurrent Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
The ubiquitous adoption of Internet-of-Things (IoT) based applications has resulted in the emergence of the Fog computing paradigm, which allows seamlessly harnessing both mobile-edge and cloud resources. Efficient scheduling of application tasks in such environments is challenging due to constrained resource capabilities, mobility factors in IoT, resource heterogeneity, network hierarchy, and stochastic behaviors. Existing heuristics and Reinforcement Learning based approaches lack generalizability and quick adaptability, thus failing to tackle this problem optimally. They are also unable to utilize the temporal workload patterns and are suitable only for centralized setups. However, asynchronous-advantage-actor-critic (A3C) learning is known to quickly adapt to dynamic scenarios with less data and residual recurrent neural network (R2N2) to quickly update model parameters. Thus, we propose an A3C based real-time scheduler for stochastic Edge-Cloud environments allowing decentralized learning, concurrently across multiple agents. We use the R2N2 architecture to capture a large number of host and task parameters together with temporal patterns to provide efficient scheduling decisions. The proposed model is adaptive and able to tune different hyper-parameters based on the application requirements. We explicate our choice of hyper-parameters through sensitivity analysis. The experiments conducted on real-world data set show a significant improvement in terms of energy consumption, response time, Service-Level-Agreement and running cost by 14.4, 7.74, 31.9, and 4.64 percent, respectively when compared to the state-of-the-art algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · Cited by 12,293
Self-citation(2016) · Cited by 11,679
(2017) · Cited by 11,625
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00992698 · Cited by 9,083
Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mnih, V., Badia, A. P., Mirza, M., Graves, A., Lillicrap, T. P., Harley, T., Silver, D., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.01783 · Cited by 7,132
Introduction to Reinforcement Learning
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · Cited by 6,855
Calheiros, R. N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., De Rose, C. A. F., & Buyya, R. (2011) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.995 · Cited by 4,948
Self-citationNonlinear Multiobjective Optimization
Miettinen, K. (1998) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6 · Cited by 4,710
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022676722315 · Cited by 3,907
Cited by
Walia, G. K., Kumar, M., & Gill, S. S. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3338015 · Cited by 279
Goudarzi, M., Palaniswami, M., & Buyya, R. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2021.3123165 · Cited by 155
Self-citationHunterplus: ai based energy-efficient task scheduling for cloud–fog computing environments
Iftikhar, S., Ahmad, M. M. M., Tuli, S., Chowdhury, D., Xu, M., Gill, S. S., & Uhlig, S. (2023) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100667 · Cited by 153
Self-citationNabavi, S. S., Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Masdari, M., & Garraghan, P. (2022) · International Journal of Communication Systems · doi:10.1002/dac.4747 · Cited by 35
TFormer: A Transmission-Friendly ViT Model for IoT Devices
Lu, Z., Ding, C., Juefei-Xu, F., Boddeti, V. N., Wang, S., & Yang, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2022.3222765 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuli, S., Ilager, S., Ramamohanarao, K., & Buyya, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
- Published
- 2022-03-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 940-954
- ISSN
- 1536-1233 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0660
- 2161-9875
- OpenAlex
- W3059506646
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Scheduling for Stochastic Edge-Cloud Computing Environments Using A3C Learning and Residual Recurrent Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmc.2020.3017079
- The paper
- Tuli, S., Ilager, S., Ramamohanarao, K., & Buyya, R. (2022). Dynamic Scheduling for Stochastic Edge-Cloud Computing Environments Using A3C Learning and Residual Recurrent Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2020.3017079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.