Cited by 205Battery Modeling and ManagementControl Systems and IdentificationTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Condition Monitoring in Advanced Battery Management Systems: Moving Horizon Estimation Using a Reduced Electrochemical Model

Hu, Xiaosong, Cao, Dongpu, Egardt, Bo·2018·IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics

Abstract

Efficient battery condition monitoring is of particular importance in large-scale, high-performance, and safety-critical mechatronic systems, e.g., electrified vehicles and smart grid. This paper pursues a detailed assessment of optimization-driven moving horizon estimation (MHE) framework by means of a reduced electrochemical model. For state-of-charge estimation, the standard MHE and two variants in the framework are examined by a comprehensive consideration of accuracy, computational intensity, effect of horizon size, and fault tolerance. A comparison with common extended Kalman filtering and unscented Kalman filtering is also carried out. Then, the feasibility and performance are demonstrated for accessing internal battery states unavailable in equivalent circuit models, such as solid-phase surface concentration and electrolyte concentration. Ultimately, a multiscale MHE-type scheme is created for State-of-Health estimation. This study is the first known systematic investigation of MHE-type estimators applied to battery management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmech.2017.2675920

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. rawlings, 2009, Model Predictive Control Theory and Design
  2. newman, 2008, Fortran programs for the simulation of electrochemical systems, University of California at Berkeley CA USA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 205

Metadata

Authors
Hu, X., Cao, D., & Egardt, B.
Affiliations
  • Chongqing University (CN)
  • Cranfield University (GB)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Venue
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
Published
2018-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
167-178
ISSN
  • 1083-4435 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-014X
OpenAlex
W2594530559
Cited by
205
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26
FWCI
13.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics (publishedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Mass Spectrometry Society
  • Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Keywords
battery state monitoring, moving horizon estimation, state of charge estimation, state of health estimation, electrolyte concentration, multiscale estimation, fault tolerance, horizon size, electrified vehicles, smart grid, extended Kalman filter, unscented Kalman filter, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review