The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An accurate and efficient Bayesian method for automatic segmentation of brain MRI
Abstract
Automatic three-dimensional (3-D) segmentation of the brain from magnetic resonance (MR) scans is a challenging problem that has received an enormous amount of attention lately. Of the techniques reported in the literature, very few are fully automatic. In this paper, we present an efficient and accurate, fully automatic 3-D segmentation procedure for brain MR scans. It has several salient features; namely, the following. 1) Instead of a single multiplicative bias field that affects all tissue intensities, separate parametric smooth models are used for the intensity of each class. 2) A brain atlas is used in conjunction with a robust registration procedure to find a nonrigid transformation that maps the standard brain to the specimen to be segmented. This transformation is then used to: segment the brain from nonbrain tissue; compute prior probabilities for each class at each voxel location and find an appropriate automatic initialization. 3) Finally, a novel algorithm is presented which is a variant of the expectation-maximization procedure, that incorporates a fast and accurate way to find optimal segmentations, given the intensity models along with the spatial coherence assumption. Experimental results with both synthetic and real data are included, as well as comparisons of the performance of our algorithm with that of other published methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data
Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P., & Evans, A. C. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.668698 · Cited by 4,731
Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., & Suetens, P. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.563664 · Cited by 4,547
Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with maxwell’s demons
Thirion, J.-P. (1998) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(98)80022-4 · Cited by 2,445
Metadata
- Authors
- Marroquin, J. L., Vemuri, B. C., Botello, S., Calderon, E., & Fernandez-Bouzas, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 934-945
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135365788
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An accurate and efficient Bayesian method for automatic segmentation of brain MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2002.803119
- The paper
- Marroquin, J. L., Vemuri, B. C., Botello, S., Calderon, E., & Fernandez-Bouzas, A. (2002). An accurate and efficient Bayesian method for automatic segmentation of brain MRI. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2002.803119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.