The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate an approach based on support vector machines (SVMs) for detection of microcalcification (MC) clusters in digital mammograms, and propose a successive enhancement learning scheme for improved performance. SVM is a machine-learning method, based on the principle of structural risk minimization, which performs well when applied to data outside the training set. We formulate MC detection as a supervised-learning problem and apply SVM to develop the detection algorithm. We use the SVM to detect at each location in the image whether an MC is present or not. We tested the proposed method using a database of 76 clinical mammograms containing 1120 MCs. We use free-response receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate detection performance, and compare the proposed algorithm with several existing methods. In our experiments, the proposed SVM framework outperformed all the other methods tested. In particular, a sensitivity as high as 94% was achieved by the SVM method at an error rate of one false-positive cluster per image. The ability of SVM to out perform several well-known methods developed for the widely studied problem of MC detection suggests that SVM is a promising technique for object detection in a medical imaging application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Machine learning in manufacturing: Advantages, challenges, and applications
Wuest, T., Weimer, D., Irgens, C., & Thoben, K.-D. (2016) · Production & Manufacturing Research · doi:10.1080/21693277.2016.1192517 · Cited by 1,319
eD octor: machine learning and the future of medicine
Handelman, G. S., Kok, H. K., Chandra, R. V., Razavi, A. H., Lee, M. J., & Asadi, H. (2018) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12822 · Cited by 956
El Naqa, I., & Murphy, M. J. (2015) · Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18305-3_1 · Cited by 772
Self-citationMachine learning in medical applications: a review of state-of-the-art methods
Shehab, M., Abualigah, L., Shambour, Q., Abu-Hashem, M. A., Shambour, M. K. Y., Alsalibi, A. I., & Gandomi, A. H. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105458 · Cited by 542
Breast cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks and support vector machines
Ragab, D. A., Sharkas, M., Marshall, S., & Ren, J. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.6201 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- El-Naqa, I., Yang, Y., Wernick, M. N., Galatsanos, N. P., & Nishikawa, R. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1552-1563
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133458583
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2002.806569
- The paper
- El-Naqa, I., Yang, Y., Wernick, M. N., Galatsanos, N. P., & Nishikawa, R. M. (2002). A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2002.806569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.