The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optic Disk and Cup Segmentation From Monocular Color Retinal Images for Glaucoma Assessment
Abstract
Automatic retinal image analysis is emerging as an important screening tool for early detection of eye diseases. Glaucoma is one of the most common causes of blindness. The manual examination of optic disk (OD) is a standard procedure used for detecting glaucoma. In this paper, we present an automatic OD parameterization technique based on segmented OD and cup regions obtained from monocular retinal images. A novel OD segmentation method is proposed which integrates the local image information around each point of interest in multidimensional feature space to provide robustness against variations found in and around the OD region. We also propose a novel cup segmentation method which is based on anatomical evidence such as vessel bends at the cup boundary, considered relevant by glaucoma experts. Bends in a vessel are robustly detected using a region of support concept, which automatically selects the right scale for analysis. A multi-stage strategy is employed to derive a reliable subset of vessel bends called r-bends followed by a local spline fitting to derive the desired cup boundary. The method has been evaluated on 138 images comprising 33 normal and 105 glaucomatous images against three glaucoma experts. The obtained segmentation results show consistency in handling various geometric and photometric variations found across the dataset. The estimation error of the method for vertical cup-to-disk diameter ratio is 0.09/0.08 (mean/standard deviation) while for cup-to-disk area ratio it is 0.12/0.10. Overall, the obtained qualitative and quantitative results show effectiveness in both segmentation and subsequent OD parameterization for glaucoma assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Orlando, J. I., Fu, H., Barbosa Breda, J., van Keer, K., Bathula, D. R., Diaz-Pinto, A., Fang, R., Heng, P.-A., Kim, J., Lee, J., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101570 · Cited by 855
Disc-Aware Ensemble Network for Glaucoma Screening From Fundus Image
Fu, H., Cheng, J., Xu, Y., Zhang, C., Wong, D. W. K., Liu, J., & Cao, X. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2837012 · Cited by 394
Fully automatized parallel segmentation of the optic disc in retinal fundus images
Díaz-Pernil, D., Fondón, I., Peña-Cantillana, F., & Gutiérrez-Naranjo, M. A. (2016) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2016.04.025 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Joshi, G. D., Sivaswamy, J., & Krishnadas, S. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1192-1205
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2108824200
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optic Disk and Cup Segmentation From Monocular Color Retinal Images for Glaucoma Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2011.2106509
- The paper
- Joshi, G. D., Sivaswamy, J., & Krishnadas, S. R. (2011). Optic Disk and Cup Segmentation From Monocular Color Retinal Images for Glaucoma Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2011.2106509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.