The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping Myocardial Fiber Orientation Using Echocardiography-Based Shear Wave Imaging
Abstract
The assessment of disrupted myocardial fiber arrangement may help to understand and diagnose hypertrophic or ischemic cardiomyopathy. We hereby proposed and developed shear wave imaging (SWI), which is an echocardiography-based, noninvasive, real-time, and easy-to-use technique, to map myofiber orientation. Five in vitro porcine and three in vivo open-chest ovine hearts were studied. Known in physics, shear wave propagates faster along than across the fiber direction. SWI is a technique that can generate shear waves travelling in different directions with respect to each myocardial layer. SWI further analyzed the shear wave velocity across the entire left-ventricular (LV) myocardial thickness, ranging between 10 (diastole) and 25 mm (systole), with a resolution of 0.2 mm in the middle segment of the LV anterior wall region. The fiber angle at each myocardial layer was thus estimated by finding the maximum shear wave speed. In the in vitro porcine myocardium (n=5) , the SWI-estimated fiber angles gradually changed from +80° ± 7° (endocardium) to +30° ± 13° (midwall) and -40° ± 10° (epicardium) with 0° aligning with the circumference of the heart. This transmural fiber orientation was well correlated with histology findings. SWI further succeeded in mapping the transmural fiber orientation in three beating ovine hearts in vivo. At midsystole, the average fiber orientation exhibited 71° ± 13° (endocardium), 27° ± 8° (midwall), and -26° ± 30° (epicardium). We demonstrated the capability of SWI in mapping myocardial fiber orientation in vitro and in vivo. SWI may serve as a new tool for the noninvasive characterization of myocardial fiber structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relating myocardial laminar architecture to shear strain and muscle fiber orientation
Arts, T., Costa, K. D., Covell, J. W., & McCulloch, A. D. (2001) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.5.h2222 · Cited by 172
Cited by
3D ultrafast ultrasound imaging in vivo
Provost, J., Papadacci, C., Arango, J. E., Imbault, M., Fink, M., Gennisson, J.-L., Tanter, M., & Pernot, M. (2014) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/19/l1 · Cited by 356
Self-citationGennisson, J.-L., Grenier, N., Combe, C., & Tanter, M. (2012) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.013 · Cited by 260
Self-citationAssessing Myocardial Architecture: The Challenges and Controversies
Agger, P., & Stephenson, R. S. (2020) · Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease · doi:10.3390/jcdd7040047 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, W.-N., Pernot, M., Couade, M., Messas, E., Bruneval, P., Bel, A., Hagege, A. A., Fink, M., & Tanter, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 554-562
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2017754264
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping Myocardial Fiber Orientation Using Echocardiography-Based Shear Wave Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2011.2172690
- The paper
- Lee, W.-N., Pernot, M., Couade, M., Messas, E., Bruneval, P., Bel, A., Hagege, A. A., Fink, M., & Tanter, M. (2012). Mapping Myocardial Fiber Orientation Using Echocardiography-Based Shear Wave Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2011.2172690
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.