Cited by 286Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

Tumor-Cut: Segmentation of Brain Tumors on Contrast Enhanced MR Images for Radiosurgery Applications

Hamamci, A., Kucuk, N., Karaman, K., Engin, K., Unal, G.·2012·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

In this paper, we present a fast and robust practical tool for segmentation of solid tumors with minimal user interaction to assist clinicians and researchers in radiosurgery planning and assessment of the response to the therapy. Particularly, a cellular automata (CA) based seeded tumor segmentation method on contrast enhanced T1 weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images, which standardizes the volume of interest (VOI) and seed selection, is proposed. First, we establish the connection of the CA-based segmentation to the graph-theoretic methods to show that the iterative CA framework solves the shortest path problem. In that regard, we modify the state transition function of the CA to calculate the exact shortest path solution. Furthermore, a sensitivity parameter is introduced to adapt to the heterogeneous tumor segmentation problem, and an implicit level set surface is evolved on a tumor probability map constructed from CA states to impose spatial smoothness. Sufficient information to initialize the algorithm is gathered from the user simply by a line drawn on the maximum diameter of the tumor, in line with the clinical practice. Furthermore, an algorithm based on CA is presented to differentiate necrotic and enhancing tumor tissue content, which gains importance for a detailed assessment of radiation therapy response. Validation studies on both clinical and synthetic brain tumor datasets demonstrate 80%-90% overlap performance of the proposed algorithm with an emphasis on less sensitivity to seed initialization, robustness with respect to different and heterogeneous tumor types, and its efficiency in terms of computation time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2011.2181857

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 286

Authors
Hamamci, A., Kucuk, N., Karaman, K., Engin, K., & Unal, G.
Affiliations
Seyhan Devlet Hastanesi (TR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2012-03
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
790-804
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2079842879
Cited by
286
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sabanci University (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
brain tumor segmentation, cellular automata, radiosurgery planning, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, shortest path, level set evolution, user-guided segmentation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Biological, Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Radiosurgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review