The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low-Dose X-ray CT Reconstruction via Dictionary Learning
Open accessAbstract
Although diagnostic medical imaging provides enormous benefits in the early detection and accuracy diagnosis of various diseases, there are growing concerns on the potential side effect of radiation induced genetic, cancerous and other diseases. How to reduce radiation dose while maintaining the diagnostic performance is a major challenge in the computed tomography (CT) field. Inspired by the compressive sensing theory, the sparse constraint in terms of total variation (TV) minimization has already led to promising results for low-dose CT reconstruction. Compared to the discrete gradient transform used in the TV method, dictionary learning is proven to be an effective way for sparse representation. On the other hand, it is important to consider the statistical property of projection data in the low-dose CT case. Recently, we have developed a dictionary learning based approach for low-dose X-ray CT. In this paper, we present this method in detail and evaluate it in experiments. In our method, the sparse constraint in terms of a redundant dictionary is incorporated into an objective function in a statistical iterative reconstruction framework. The dictionary can be either predetermined before an image reconstruction task or adaptively defined during the reconstruction process. An alternating minimization scheme is developed to minimize the objective function. Our approach is evaluated with low-dose X-ray projections collected in animal and human CT studies, and the improvement associated with dictionary learning is quantified relative to filtered backprojection and TV-based reconstructions. The results show that the proposed approach might produce better images with lower noise and more detailed structural features in our selected cases. However, there is no proof that this is true for all kinds of structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Brenner, D. J., Elliston, C. D., Hall, E. J., & Berdon, W. E. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 · Cited by 3,222 · cited 1×
“It is well known that X-ray radiation can be harmful which may induce genetic, cancerous, and other diseases [1]–[3].”
Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries
de González, A. B., & Darby, S. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15433-0 · Cited by 1,718
Sparse Representation for Color Image Restoration
Mairal, J., Elad, M., & Sapiro, G. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.911828 · Cited by 1,716
Cited by
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2713099 · Cited by 2,529
“Learning has also been explored for X-ray CT reconstruction; In [43], the authors use a regularization term that promotes patches of the reconstruction to be sparse in a learned dictionary.”
MethodYang, Q., Yan, P., Zhang, Y., Yu, H., Shi, Y., Mou, X., Kalra, M. K., Zhang, Y., Sun, L., & Wang, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2827462 · Cited by 1,630
Self-citationPlug-and-Play priors for model based reconstruction
Venkatakrishnan, S. V., Bouman, C. A., & Wohlberg, B. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1109/globalsip.2013.6737048 · Cited by 1,178
aLow-dose CT via convolutional neural network
Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Liao, P., Li, K., Zhou, J., & Wang, G. (2017) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.8.000679 · Cited by 755
Self-citationLearned Primal-Dual Reconstruction
Adler, J., & Oktem, O. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2799231 · Cited by 758
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, Q., Yu, H., Mou, X., Zhang, L., Hsieh, J., & Wang, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1682-1697
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2094366314
- Cited by
- 690
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 25.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-Dose X-ray CT Reconstruction via Dictionary Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2012.2195669
- The paper
- Xu, Q., Yu, H., Mou, X., Zhang, L., Hsieh, J., & Wang, G. (2012). Low-Dose X-ray CT Reconstruction via Dictionary Learning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2012.2195669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.