3D-2D Registration of Cerebral Angiograms: A Method and Evaluation on Clinical Images
Abstract
Endovascular image-guided interventions (EIGI) involve navigation of a catheter through the vasculature followed by application of treatment at the site of anomaly using live 2D projection images for guidance. 3D images acquired prior to EIGI are used to quantify the vascular anomaly and plan the intervention. If fused with the information of live 2D images they can also facilitate navigation and treatment. For this purpose 3D-2D image registration is required. Although several 3D-2D registration methods for EIGI achieve registration accuracy below 1 mm, their clinical application is still limited by insufficient robustness or reliability. In this paper, we propose a 3D-2D registration method based on matching a 3D vasculature model to intensity gradients of live 2D images. To objectively validate 3D-2D registration methods, we acquired a clinical image database of 10 patients undergoing cerebral EIGI and established "gold standard" registrations by aligning fiducial markers in 3D and 2D images. The proposed method had mean registration accuracy below 0.65 mm, which was comparable to tested state-of-the-art methods, and execution time below 1 s. With the highest rate of successful registrations and the highest capture range the proposed method was the most robust and thus a good candidate for application in EIGI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neural networks trained on small datasets for 2D/3D registration fail on new patients or require impractical landmark supervision.
“neural networks trained on small datasets fail on new patients or require impractical landmark supervision”
From Intraoperative 2D/3D Image Registration via Differentiable X-Ray Rendering (2024) · cites this paper as [41]
Only a few small labeled datasets exist for training deep networks for landmark localization, preventing generalization to new patients, procedures, and pathologies.
“While landmark localizers can be learned, only a few small labeled datasets exist for training deep networks [24, 41, 50], preventing the generalization of these methods to new patients, procedures, and pathologies.”
From Intraoperative 2D/3D Image Registration via Differentiable X-Ray Rendering (2024) · cites this paper as [41]
Intensity-based approaches have demonstrated higher accuracy and reliability than feature-based and gradient-based approaches.
“Intensity-based approaches utilize all the intensity information contained in the 2D and 3D images, as opposed to the feature-based approach where, image features extracted from 2D and 3D images are used for the registration, and the gradient-based approach which utilizes the fact that rays connecting the x-ray source and edges in the projection image are tangent to surfaces of distinct anatomical”
From Robust 3D–2D image registration: application to spine interventions and vertebral labeling in the presence of anatomical deformation (2013) · cites this paper as Mitrovic et al 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Mitrovic, U., Spiclin, Z., Likar, B., & Pernus, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1550-1563
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W1966807770
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
- Keywords
- 2D-3D registration, registration accuracy, fiducial markers, cerebral vascular anomalies
- MeSH terms
- Cerebral Angiography, Humans, Databases, Factual, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Endovascular Procedures, Fiducial Markers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review