The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Stochastic Polygons Model for Glandular Structures in Colon Histology Images
Abstract
In this paper, we present a stochastic model for glandular structures in histology images of tissue slides stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin, choosing colon tissue as an example. The proposed Random Polygons Model (RPM) treats each glandular structure in an image as a polygon made of a random number of vertices, where the vertices represent approximate locations of epithelial nuclei. We formulate the RPM as a Bayesian inference problem by defining a prior for spatial connectivity and arrangement of neighboring epithelial nuclei and a likelihood for the presence of a glandular structure. The inference is made via a Reversible-Jump Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. To the best of our knowledge, all existing published algorithms for gland segmentation are designed to mainly work on healthy samples, adenomas, and low grade adenocarcinomas. One of them has been demonstrated to work on intermediate grade adenocarcinomas at its best. Our experimental results show that the RPM yields favorable results, both quantitatively and qualitatively, for extraction of glandular structures in histology images of normal human colon tissues as well as benign and cancerous tissues, excluding undifferentiated carcinomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis
Macenko, M., Niethammer, M., Marron, J. S., Borland, D., Woosley, J. T., Guan, X., Schmitt, C., & Thomas, N. E. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro · doi:10.1109/isbi.2009.5193250 · Cited by 1,482
Cited by
Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: challenges and opportunities
Madabhushi, A., & Lee, G. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.06.037 · Cited by 1,093
Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer
Bychkov, D., Linder, N., Turkki, R., Nordling, S., Kovanen, P. E., Verrill, C., Walliander, M., Lundin, M., Haglund, C., & Lundin, J. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3 · Cited by 644
DCAN: Deep Contour-Aware Networks for Accurate Gland Segmentation
Chen, H., Qi, X., Yu, L., & Heng, P.-A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.273 · Cited by 623
Cancer Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Bibliographic Review
Munir, K., Elahi, H., Ayub, A., Frezza, F., & Rizzi, A. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11091235 · Cited by 422
Deep learning for classification of colorectal polyps on whole-slide images
Korbar, B., Olofson, A. M., Miraflor, A. P., Nicka, C. M., Suriawinata, M. A., Torresani, L., Suriawinata, A. A., & Hassanpour, S. (2017) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_34_17 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Sirinukunwattana, K., Snead, D. R. J., & Rajpoot, N. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2366-2378
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W1950315773
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Stochastic Polygons Model for Glandular Structures in Colon Histology Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2015.2433900
- The paper
- Sirinukunwattana, K., Snead, D. R. J., & Rajpoot, N. M. (2015). A Stochastic Polygons Model for Glandular Structures in Colon Histology Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2015.2433900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.