The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auto-Context Convolutional Neural Network (Auto-Net) for Brain Extraction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Brain extraction or whole brain segmentation is an important first step in many of the neuroimage analysis pipelines. The accuracy and the robustness of brain extraction, therefore, are crucial for the accuracy of the entire brain analysis process. The state-of-the-art brain extraction techniques rely heavily on the accuracy of alignment or registration between brain atlases and query brain anatomy, and/or make assumptions about the image geometry, and therefore have limited success when these assumptions do not hold or image registration fails. With the aim of designing an accurate, learning-based, geometry-independent, and registration-free brain extraction tool, in this paper, we present a technique based on an auto-context convolutional neural network (CNN), in which intrinsic local and global image features are learned through 2-D patches of different window sizes. We consider two different architectures: 1) a voxelwise approach based on three parallel 2-D convolutional pathways for three different directions (axial, coronal, and sagittal) that implicitly learn 3-D image information without the need for computationally expensive 3-D convolutions and 2) a fully convolutional network based on the U-net architecture. Posterior probability maps generated by the networks are used iteratively as context information along with the original image patches to learn the local shape and connectedness of the brain to extract it from non-brain tissue. The brain extraction results we have obtained from our CNNs are superior to the recently reported results in the literature on two publicly available benchmark data sets, namely, LPBA40 and OASIS, in which we obtained the Dice overlap coefficients of 97.73% and 97.62%, respectively. Significant improvement was achieved via our auto-context algorithm. Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of our algorithm in the challenging problem of extracting arbitrarily oriented fetal brains in reconstructed fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data sets. In this application, our voxelwise auto-context CNN performed much better than the other methods (Dice coefficient: 95.97%), where the other methods performed poorly due to the non-standard orientation and geometry of the fetal brain in MRI. Through training, our method can provide accurate brain extraction in challenging applications. This, in turn, may reduce the problems associated with image registration in segmentation tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.00915 · Cited by 22,392
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Yushkevich, P. A., Piven, J., Hazlett, H. C., Smith, R. G., Ho, S., Gee, J. C., & Gerig, G. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 · Cited by 8,868
Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFs
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.7062 · Cited by 4,213
Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Simpson, J. P., Kane, A. D., Menon, D. K., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004 · Cited by 3,498 · cited 2×
“gies thus offer limited flexibility; but when integrated into deep CNNs, they have shown significant gain in segmentation accuracy [10], [21].”
BackgroundMethodBrain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks
Havaei, M., Davy, A., Warde-Farley, D., Biard, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., Pal, C., Jodoin, P.-M., & Larochelle, H. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 · Cited by 3,278
Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images
Pereira, S., Pinto, A., Alves, V., & Silva, C. A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2538465 · Cited by 2,735
Automatic Segmentation of MR Brain Images With a Convolutional Neural Network
Moeskops, P., Viergever, M. A., Mendrik, A. M., de Vries, L. S., Benders, M. J. N. L., & Isgum, I. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2548501 · Cited by 861 · cited 1×
“[18] used different window sizes around voxels but in 2D views.”
Method
Cited by
Medical image segmentation using deep learning: A survey
Wang, R., Lei, T., Cui, R., Zhang, B., Meng, H., & Nandi, A. K. (2022) · IET Image Processing · doi:10.1049/ipr2.12419 · Cited by 892
Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks
Isensee, F., Schell, M., Pflueger, I., Brugnara, G., Bonekamp, D., Neuberger, U., Wick, A., Schlemmer, H., Heiland, S., Wick, W., et al. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24750 · Cited by 722
Wang, G., Li, W., Aertsen, M., Deprest, J., Ourselin, S., & Vercauteren, T. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.103 · Cited by 659
Dual-force convolutional neural networks for accurate brain tumor segmentation
Chen, S., Ding, C., & Liu, M. (2019) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.11.009 · Cited by 195
Real-time Deep Pose Estimation with Geodesic Loss for Image-to-Template Rigid Registration
Salehi, S. S. M., Khan, S., Erdogmus, D., & Gholipour, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.05982 · Cited by 118
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohseni Salehi, S. S., Erdogmus, D., & Gholipour, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2319-2330
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2729876886
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auto-Context Convolutional Neural Network (Auto-Net) for Brain Extraction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2017.2721362
- The paper
- Mohseni Salehi, S. S., Erdogmus, D., & Gholipour, A. (2017). Auto-Context Convolutional Neural Network (Auto-Net) for Brain Extraction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2017.2721362
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.