The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction
Open accessAbstract
Inspired by recent advances in deep learning, we propose a framework for reconstructing dynamic sequences of 2-D cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images from undersampled data using a deep cascade of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to accelerate the data acquisition process. In particular, we address the case where data are acquired using aggressive Cartesian undersampling. First, we show that when each 2-D image frame is reconstructed independently, the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art 2-D compressed sensing approaches, such as dictionary learning-based MR image reconstruction, in terms of reconstruction error and reconstruction speed. Second, when reconstructing the frames of the sequences jointly, we demonstrate that CNNs can learn spatio-temporal correlations efficiently by combining convolution and data sharing approaches. We show that the proposed method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods and is capable of preserving anatomical structure more faithfully up to 11-fold undersampling. Moreover, reconstruction is very fast: each complete dynamic sequence can be reconstructed in less than 10 s and, for the 2-D case, each image frame can be reconstructed in 23 ms, enabling real-time applications.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“convolutional recurrent neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction [135], reconstructing good quality cardiac MR images from highly undersampled complex-valued k -space data by learning spatio-temporal dependencies, outperforming 3D CNN approaches and compressed sensing-based dynamic MRI reconstruction algorithms in computational complexity, reconstruction accuracy and speed for different”
From An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI (2019) · cites this paper as [135]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks
Dong, C., Loy, C. C., He, K., & Tang, X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2439281 · Cited by 10,105
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lustig, Faster imaging with randomly perturbed, under-sampled spirals and L1 reconstruction, 685
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI
Lundervold, A. S., & Lundervold, A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002 · Cited by 2,058
MoDL: Model-Based Deep Learning Architecture for Inverse Problems
Aggarwal, H. K., Mani, M., & Jacob, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2865356 · Cited by 1,210
Yang, G., Yu, S., Dong, H., Slabaugh, G., Dragotti, P. L., Ye, X., Liu, F., Arridge, S., Keegan, J., Guo, Y., et al. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2785879 · Cited by 1,095
An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI
Lundervold, A. S., & Lundervold, A. (2018) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 1,012
Deep learning in medical imaging and radiation therapy
Sahiner, B., Pezeshk, A. X., Hadjiiski, L. M., Wang, X., Drukker, K., Cha, K. H., Summers, R. M., & Giger, M. L. (2018) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.13264 · Cited by 763
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlemper, J., Caballero, J., Hajnal, J. V., Price, A. N., & Rueckert, D.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 491-503
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2594014149
- Cited by
- 1,338
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 217 · 2020: 182 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 54
- FWCI
- 78.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- EPSRC Programme (EP/P001009/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Keywords
- MRI reconstruction, compressed sensing, spatio-temporal correlation, real-time reconstruction
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Heart, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
