The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Effects of Training Sample Size on Multi-Stage Transfer Learning Using Deep Neural Nets
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we developed a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for the classification of malignant and benign masses in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) using a multi-stage transfer learning approach that utilized data from similar auxiliary domains for intermediate-stage fine-tuning. Breast imaging data from DBT, digitized screen-film mammography, and digital mammography totaling 4039 unique regions of interest (1797 malignant and 2242 benign) were collected. Using cross validation, we selected the best transfer network from six transfer networks by varying the level up to which the convolutional layers were frozen. In a single-stage transfer learning approach, knowledge from CNN trained on the ImageNet data was fine-tuned directly with the DBT data. In a multi-stage transfer learning approach, knowledge learned from ImageNet was first fine-tuned with the mammography data and then fine-tuned with the DBT data. Two transfer networks were compared for the second-stage transfer learning by freezing most of the CNN structures versus freezing only the first convolutional layer. We studied the dependence of the classification performance on training sample size for various transfer learning and fine-tuning schemes by varying the training data from 1% to 100% of the available sets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as a performance measure. The view-based AUC on the test set for single-stage transfer learning was 0.85 ± 0.05 and improved significantly (p <; 0.05$ ) to 0.91 ± 0.03 for multi-stage learning. This paper demonstrated that, when the training sample size from the target domain is limited, an additional stage of transfer learning using data from a similar auxiliary domain is advantageous.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., & Lipson, H. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1792 · Cited by 6,061
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
Clark, K., Vendt, B., Smith, K., Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Koppel, P., Moore, S., Phillips, S., Maffitt, D., Pringle, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 · Cited by 4,599
Learning and Transferring Mid-level Image Representations Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Oquab, M., Bottou, L., Laptev, I., & Sivic, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.222 · Cited by 3,150
Giger, M. L., Chan, H., & Boone, J. (2008) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3013555 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Cited by
Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review
Kim, H. E., Cosa-Linan, A., Santhanam, N., Jannesari, M., Maros, M. E., & Ganslandt, T. (2022) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-022-00793-7 · Cited by 965
Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis
Chan, H.-P., Samala, R. K., Hadjiiski, L. M., & Zhou, C. (2020) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_1 · Cited by 747
Self-citationBalki, I., Amirabadi, A., Levman, J., Martel, A. L., Emersic, Z., Meden, B., Garcia-Pedrero, A., Ramirez, S. C., Kong, D., Moody, A. R., et al. (2019) · Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal · doi:10.1016/j.carj.2019.06.002 · Cited by 299
A Review of Deep Learning on Medical Image Analysis
Wang, J., Zhu, H., Wang, S.-H., & Zhang, Y.-D. (2021) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-020-01672-7 · Cited by 303
Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
Gardezi, S. J. S., Elazab, A., Lei, B., & Wang, T. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14464 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Samala, R. K., Chan, H.-P., Hadjiiski, L., Helvie, M. A., Richter, C. D., & Cha, K. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 686-696
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2892235178
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Effects of Training Sample Size on Multi-Stage Transfer Learning Using Deep Neural Nets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2018.2870343
- The paper
- Samala, R. K., Chan, H.-P., Hadjiiski, L., Helvie, M. A., Richter, C. D., & Cha, K. H. (2019). Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Effects of Training Sample Size on Multi-Stage Transfer Learning Using Deep Neural Nets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2018.2870343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.