Cited by 144Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging and AnalysisAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Efficient Multiple Organ Localization in CT Image Using 3D Region Proposal Network

Xu, Xuanang, Zhou, Fugen, Liu, Bo, Fu, Dongshan, Bai, Xiangzhi·2019·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Organ localization is an essential preprocessing step for many medical image analysis tasks such as image registration, organ segmentation and lesion detection. In this work, we propose an efficient method for multiple organ localization in CT image using 3D region proposal network. Compared with other convolutional neural network based methods that successively detect the target organs in all slices to assemble the final 3D bounding box, our method is fully implemented in 3D manner, thus can take full advantages of the spatial context information in CT image to perform efficient organ localization with only one prediction. We also propose a novel backbone network architecture that generates high-resolution feature maps to further improve the localization performance on small organs. We evaluate our method on two clinical datasets, where 11 body organs and 12 head organs (or anatomical structures) are included. As our results shown, the proposed method achieves higher detection precision and localization accuracy than the current state-of-theart methods with approximate 4 to 18 times faster processing speed. Additionally, we have established a public dataset dedicated for organ localization on http://dx. doi.org/10.21227/df8g-pq27. The full implementation of the proposed method have also been made publicly available on https://github.com/superxuang/caffe_3d_faster_rcnn.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2019.2894854

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OrganMNIST3D is a 3D dataset based on the same source as Organ{A,C,S}MNIST, using 3D bounding boxes processed into 28 × 28 × 28 for multi-class classification of 11 body organs.

    “The source of the OrganMNIST3D is the same as that of the Organ{A,C,S}MNIST. Instead of 2D images, we directly use the 3D bounding boxes and process the images into 28 × 28 × 28 to perform multi-class classification of 11 body organs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, X., Zhou, F., Liu, B., Fu, D., & Bai, X.
Affiliations
Beihang University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2019-08
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1885-1898
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2912564039
Cited by
144
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61601012)
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0113100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
organ localization, CT images, high-resolution feature maps, anatomical structure detection, organ registration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review