Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Large-Scale Database and a CNN Model for Attention-Based Glaucoma Detection

Li, Liu, Xu, Mai, Liu, Hanruo, Li, Yang, Wang, Xiaofei, Jiang, Lai, Wang, Zulin, Fan, Xiang, Wang, Ningli·2020·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible vision loss. Many approaches have recently been proposed for automatic glaucoma detection based on fundus images. However, none of the existing approaches can efficiently remove high redundancy in fundus images for glaucoma detection, which may reduce the reliability and accuracy of glaucoma detection. To avoid this disadvantage, this paper proposes an attention-based convolutional neural network (CNN) for glaucoma detection, called AG-CNN. Specifically, we first establish a large-scale attention-based glaucoma (LAG) database, which includes 11 760 fundus images labeled as either positive glaucoma (4878) or negative glaucoma (6882). Among the 11 760 fundus images, the attention maps of 5824 images are further obtained from ophthalmologists through a simulated eye-tracking experiment. Then, a new structure of AG-CNN is designed, including an attention prediction subnet, a pathological area localization subnet, and a glaucoma classification subnet. The attention maps are predicted in the attention prediction subnet to highlight the salient regions for glaucoma detection, under a weakly supervised training manner. In contrast to other attention-based CNN methods, the features are also visualized as the localized pathological area, which are further added in our AG-CNN structure to enhance the glaucoma detection performance. Finally, the experiment results from testing over our LAG database and another public glaucoma database show that the proposed AG-CNN approach significantly advances the state-of-the-art in glaucoma detection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2019.2927226

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.05.005 · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.05.005
  2. poplin, 2017, Predicting cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs using deep learning, arXiv 1708 09843
  3. 10.1007/978-3-642-31298-4_47 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31298-4_47
  4. 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.05.023 · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.05.023
  5. 10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_17 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_17
  6. 10.1109/TIP.2016.2628583 · doi:10.1109/tip.2016.2628583

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Li, L., Xu, M., Liu, H., Li, Y., Wang, X., Jiang, L., Wang, Z., Fan, X., & Wang, N.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2020-02
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
413-424
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2960170118
Cited by
303
References
51
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • BMSTC (Z181100001918035)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61876013, 61573037)
  • Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (151061)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Large-Scale Database and a CNN Model for Attention-Based Glaucoma Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2019.2927226
The paper
Li, L., Xu, M., Liu, H., Li, Y., Wang, X., Jiang, L., Wang, Z., Fan, X., & Wang, N. (2020). A Large-Scale Database and a CNN Model for Attention-Based Glaucoma Detection. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2019.2927226

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.