The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Large-Scale Database and a CNN Model for Attention-Based Glaucoma Detection
Abstract
Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible vision loss. Many approaches have recently been proposed for automatic glaucoma detection based on fundus images. However, none of the existing approaches can efficiently remove high redundancy in fundus images for glaucoma detection, which may reduce the reliability and accuracy of glaucoma detection. To avoid this disadvantage, this paper proposes an attention-based convolutional neural network (CNN) for glaucoma detection, called AG-CNN. Specifically, we first establish a large-scale attention-based glaucoma (LAG) database, which includes 11 760 fundus images labeled as either positive glaucoma (4878) or negative glaucoma (6882). Among the 11 760 fundus images, the attention maps of 5824 images are further obtained from ophthalmologists through a simulated eye-tracking experiment. Then, a new structure of AG-CNN is designed, including an attention prediction subnet, a pathological area localization subnet, and a glaucoma classification subnet. The attention maps are predicted in the attention prediction subnet to highlight the salient regions for glaucoma detection, under a weakly supervised training manner. In contrast to other attention-based CNN methods, the features are also visualized as the localized pathological area, which are further added in our AG-CNN structure to enhance the glaucoma detection performance. Finally, the experiment results from testing over our LAG database and another public glaucoma database show that the proposed AG-CNN approach significantly advances the state-of-the-art in glaucoma detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Self-citationRethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.05.005 · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.05.005
- poplin, 2017, Predicting cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs using deep learning, arXiv 1708 09843
- 10.1007/978-3-642-31298-4_47 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31298-4_47
- 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.05.023 · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.05.023
- 10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_17 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_17
- 10.1109/TIP.2016.2628583 · doi:10.1109/tip.2016.2628583
Cited by
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis
van der Velden, B. H. M., Kuijf, H. J., Gilhuijs, K. G. A., & Viergever, M. A. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102470 · Cited by 1,328
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Xu, M., Liu, H., Li, Y., Wang, X., Jiang, L., Wang, Z., Fan, X., & Wang, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 413-424
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2960170118
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Funders
- BMSTC (Z181100001918035)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61876013, 61573037)
- Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (151061)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Large-Scale Database and a CNN Model for Attention-Based Glaucoma Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2019.2927226
- The paper
- Li, L., Xu, M., Liu, H., Li, Y., Wang, X., Jiang, L., Wang, Z., Fan, X., & Wang, N. (2020). A Large-Scale Database and a CNN Model for Attention-Based Glaucoma Detection. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2019.2927226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.