Digest: Fast and communication efficient decentralized learning with local updates
Open accessAbstract
Two widely considered decentralized learning algorithms are Gossip and random walk-based learning. Gossip algorithms (both synchronous and asynchronous versions) suffer from high communication cost, while random-walk based learning experiences increased convergence time. In this paper, we design a fast and communication-efficient asynchronous decentralized learning mechanism DIGEST by taking advantage of both Gossip and random-walk ideas, and focusing on stochastic gradient descent (SGD). DIGEST is an asynchronous decentralized algorithm building on local-SGD algorithms, which are originally designed for communication efficient centralized learning. We design both single-stream and multi-stream DIGEST, where the communication overhead may increase when the number of streams increases, and there is a convergence and communication overhead trade-off which can be leveraged. We analyze the convergence of single- and multi-stream DIGEST, and prove that both algorithms approach to the optimal solution asymptotically for both iid and non-iid data distributions. We evaluate the performance of single- and multi-stream DIGEST for logistic regression and a deep neural network ResNet20. The simulation results confirm that multi-stream DIGEST has nice convergence properties;i.e., its convergence time is better than or comparable to the baselines in iid setting, and outperforms the baselines in non-iid setting.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Securing federated models against adversarial attacks and providing ethical data handling across multiple administrative divisions add layers of complexity.
“Additionally, securing federated models against adversarial attacks and providing ethical data handling across multiple administrative divisions add layers of complexity [25,26].”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The Introduction discusses local processing and the centralized parameter server in federated learning, while Related Work focuses on communication costs and non-iid data (pages not available in our copy). Searches for adversarial attacks, security, ethical data handling, and administrative divisions found no passage addressing those claimed complexities. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 14
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data," in AISTATS, 2017.
- S. Boyd, A. Ghosh, B. Prabhakar, and D. Shah, "Randomized gossip algorithms," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 2508-2530, 2006.
- X. Lian, W. Zhang, C. Zhang, and J. Liu, "Asynchronous decentralized parallel stochastic gradient descent." in ICML, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, J. G. Dy and A. Krause, Eds., vol. 80. PMLR, 2018, pp. 3049-3058.
- T. Sun, Y. Sun, and W. Yin, "On markov chain gradient descent," in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, ser. NIPS'18. Red Hook, NY, USA:
- A. Nedic and A. Ozdaglar, "Distributed subgradient methods for multi- agent optimization," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 48-61, 2009.
- A. Spiridonoff, A. Olshevsky, and Y. Paschalidis, "Communication- efficient sgd: From local sgd to one-shot averaging," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 24 313-24 326, 2021.
- S. U. Stich and S. P. Karimireddy, "The error-feedback framework: Better rates for sgd with delayed gradients and compressed communication," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909. 05350
- Authors
- Gholami, P., & Seferoglu, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Department of ECE, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 1456-1474
- ISSN
- 2831-316X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390871389
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Army Research Laboratory (W911NF-2120272)
- National Science Foundation (CCF-1942878, CNS-2148182, CNS-2112471)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
- Keywords
- decentralized learning, communication efficiency, convergence analysis, non-IID data, distributed optimization, logistic regression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review