Cited by 397Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression RecognitionFace recognition and analysis

A natural visible and infrared facial expression database for expression recognition and emotion inference

Wang, Shangfei, Liu, Zhilei, Lv, Siliang, Lv, Yanpeng, Wu, Guobing, Peng, Peng, Chen, Fei, Wang, Xufa·2010·IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Abstract

To date, most facial expression analysis has been based on visible and posed expression databases. Visible images, however, are easily affected by illumination variations, while posed expressions differ in appearance and timing from natural ones. In this paper, we propose and establish a natural visible and infrared facial expression database, which contains both spontaneous and posed expressions of more than 100 subjects, recorded simultaneously by a visible and an infrared thermal camera, with illumination provided from three different directions. The posed database includes the apex expressional images with and without glasses. As an elementary assessment of the usability of our spontaneous database for expression recognition and emotion inference, we conduct visible facial expression recognition using four typical methods, including the eigenface approach [principle component analysis (PCA)], the fisherface approach [PCA + linear discriminant analysis (LDA)], the Active Appearance Model (AAM), and the AAM-based + LDA. We also use PCA and PCA+LDA to recognize expressions from infrared thermal images. In addition, we analyze the relationship between facial temperature and emotion through statistical analysis. Our database is available for research purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmm.2010.2060716

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 397

Authors
Wang, S., Liu, Z., Lv, S., Lv, Y., Wu, G., Peng, P., Chen, F., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Published
2010-11
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
682-691
ISSN
  • 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0077
OpenAlex
W2106947945
Cited by
397
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
18.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
facial expression recognition, emotion inference, infrared thermography, spontaneous facial expressions, facial skin temperature, illumination variation, active appearance models, eigenfaces, Fisherfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review