Progressive Learning of Low-Precision Networks for Image Classification
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed a great advance of deep learning in a variety of vision tasks. Many state-of-the-art deep neural networks suffer from large size and high complexity, which makes them difficult to deploy in resource-limited platforms such as mobile devices. To this end, low-precision neural networks are widely studied that quantize weights or activations into the low-bit format. Although efficient, low-precision networks are usually difficult to train and encounter severe accuracy degradation. In this paper, we propose a new training strategy based on progressive learning for image classification. First, we equip each low-precision convolutional layer with an ancillary full-precision convolutional layer based on a low-precision network structure. Second, a decay method is introduced to reduce the output of the added full-precision convolution gradually, which keeps the resulting topology structure the same as the original low-precision convolution. Extensive experiments on SVHN, CIFAR and ILSVRC-2012 datasets reveal that the proposed method can bring faster convergence and higher accuracy for low-precision neural networks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most recent quantization studies focused on INT quantization with integer parameters and floating-point scale factors to prevent accuracy decrease in image classification networks.
“Most recent quantization studies [21] [23] have focused on INT quantization with integer parameters and oatingpoint scale factors to prevent an accuracy decrease in networks that perform image classi cation.”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Most existing quantization studies targeted only object classification and cannot be applied to object detection.
“However, most of these existing studies targeted only object classi cation and cannot be applied to object detection.”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Zhou, Z., Zhou, W., Lv, X., Huang, X., Wang, X., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 871-882
- ISSN
- 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0077
- OpenAlex
- W3020701269
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61822208, 61836011)
- Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2018497)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- low-precision neural networks, progressive learning, image classification, weight quantization, activation quantization, resource-constrained deployment, mobile devices, convergence acceleration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review