Subject-Independent, Biological Hip Moment Estimation During Multimodal Overground Ambulation Using Deep Learning
Abstract
Estimating biological joint moments using wearable sensors could enable out-of-lab biomechanical analyses and exoskeletons that assist throughout daily life. To realize these possibilities, this study introduced a subject-independent hip moment estimator using a temporal convolutional network (TCN) and validated its performance and generalizability during multimodal ambulation. Electrogoniometer and simulated IMU data from sixteen participants walking on level ground, ramps and stairs were used to evaluate our approach when benchmarked against a fully-connected neural network, a long short-term memory network, and a baseline method (i.e., using subject-average moment curves based on ambulation mode and gait phase). Additionally, the generalizability of our approach was evaluated by testing on ground slopes, stair heights, and gait transitions withheld during model training. The TCN outperformed the benchmark approaches on the hold-out data (p2of 0.880±0.030 during steady-state ambulation. When tested on the 20 leave-one-out slope and stair height conditions, the TCN significantly increased RMSE only on the steepest (+18°) incline (p2was 0.152±0.027 Nm/kg and 0.786±0.055, respectively, during mode transitions. Thus, our approach accurately estimated hip moments and generalized to unseen gait contexts using data from three wearable sensors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TCN uses dilated causal convolutions and parallel temporal processing, provides efficient long-sequence handling with low inference latency, and is used for real-time gesture recognition and continuous trajectory prediction.
“| TCN | Dilated causal convolutions, parallel temporal | Efficient long-sequence handling, low inference | Real-time gesture recognition, continuous |”
From Recent advances in intelligent wearable systems: from multiscale biomechanical features towards human motion intent prediction (2026) · cites this paper as [243]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Molinaro, D. D., Kang, I., Camargo, J., Gombolay, M. C., & Young, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-229
- ISSN
- 2576-3202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206978223
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1650044)
- NSF NRI (1830215)
- Fulbright Foreign Student Fellowship
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Keywords
- temporal convolutional network, wearable sensors, electrogoniometer, inertial measurement unit, stair climbing, gait transition, generalizability, exoskeleton control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review