Cited by 90Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsMuscle activation and electromyography studiesGait Recognition and Analysis

Subject-Independent, Biological Hip Moment Estimation During Multimodal Overground Ambulation Using Deep Learning

Molinaro, Dean D., Kang, Inseung, Camargo, Jonathan, Gombolay, Matthew C., Young, Aaron J.·2022·IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics

Abstract

Estimating biological joint moments using wearable sensors could enable out-of-lab biomechanical analyses and exoskeletons that assist throughout daily life. To realize these possibilities, this study introduced a subject-independent hip moment estimator using a temporal convolutional network (TCN) and validated its performance and generalizability during multimodal ambulation. Electrogoniometer and simulated IMU data from sixteen participants walking on level ground, ramps and stairs were used to evaluate our approach when benchmarked against a fully-connected neural network, a long short-term memory network, and a baseline method (i.e., using subject-average moment curves based on ambulation mode and gait phase). Additionally, the generalizability of our approach was evaluated by testing on ground slopes, stair heights, and gait transitions withheld during model training. The TCN outperformed the benchmark approaches on the hold-out data (p2of 0.880±0.030 during steady-state ambulation. When tested on the 20 leave-one-out slope and stair height conditions, the TCN significantly increased RMSE only on the steepest (+18°) incline (p2was 0.152±0.027 Nm/kg and 0.786±0.055, respectively, during mode transitions. Thus, our approach accurately estimated hip moments and generalized to unseen gait contexts using data from three wearable sensors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmrb.2022.3144025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 90

Authors
Molinaro, D. D., Kang, I., Camargo, J., Gombolay, M. C., & Young, A. J.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
Published
2022-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
219-229
ISSN
2576-3202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206978223
Cited by
90
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1650044)
  • NSF NRI (1830215)
  • Fulbright Foreign Student Fellowship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
temporal convolutional network, wearable sensors, electrogoniometer, inertial measurement unit, stair climbing, gait transition, generalizability, exoskeleton control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review