Cited by 162Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingWireless Body Area Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Doppler Radar System for Heart and Respiratory Rate Measurements

Droitcour, A.D., Boric-Lubecke, O., Kovacs, G.T.A.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques

Abstract

A CMOS Doppler radar sensor has been developed and used to measure motion due to heart and respiration. The quadrature direct-conversion radar transceiver has been fully integrated in 0.25-mum CMOS, the baseband analog signal conditioning has been developed on a printed circuit board, and digital signal processing has been performed inMatlab. The theoretical signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is derived based on the radar equation, the direct-conversion receiver's properties, oscillator phase noise, range correlation, and receiver noise. Heart and respiration signatures and rates have been measured at ranges from 0.5 to 2.0 m on 22 human subjects wearing normal T-shirts. The theoretical SNR expression was validated with this study. The heart rates found with the radar sensor were compared with a three-lead electrocardiogram, and they were within 5 beats/min with 95% confidence for 16 of 22 subjects at a 0.5-m range and 11 of 22 subjects at a 1.0-m range. The respiration rates found with the radar sensor were compared with those found using a piezoelectric respiratory effort belt, and the respiration rates were within five respirations per minute for 18 of 22 subjects at a 0.5-m range, 17 of 22 subjects at a 1.0-m range, and 19 of 22 subjects at a 1.5-m range.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmtt.2009.2029668

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through signal processing, it is possible to extract biological information, such as breathing patterns, heart rate and full-body motion, from radio signals.

    “Through signal processing, it is possible to extract biological information, such as breathing patterns, heart rate and full-body motion from these findings71,73–75.”
  • High frequency and sub-millimetre wavelength radio technologies have demonstrated the ability to capture physiological signals without body contact.

    “In the past decade, high frequency and sub-millimetre wavelength radio technologies have demonstrated the ability to capture physiological signals without body contact.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1063/1.2798937 · DOI
  2. droitcour, 2002, 0.25 <formula formulatype="inline"><tex notation="tex">$\mu{\hbox{m}}$</tex></formula> cmos and bicmos single-chip direct-conversion doppler radars for remote sensing of vital signs, Int Solid-State Circuits Conf Dig, 1, 348
  3. 10.1109/TMTT.2004.823552 · DOI
  4. droitcour, 2004, chest motion sensing with modified silicon base station chips, IEICE Trans Electron, e87 c, 1524
  5. 10.1109/LMWC.2008.925113 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70126-X · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.burns.2003.10.003 · DOI
  8. 2000, Code of federal regulations title 47 Telecommunications part 15 Radio frequency devices
  9. 10.1109/SECON.1993.465731 · DOI
  10. skolnik, 1990, Radar Handbook, 1 1
  11. host-madsen, 2008, Signal Processing Techniques for Knowledge Extraction and Information Fusion
  12. 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333206 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/TMTT.2007.895653 · DOI
  14. li, 2008, complex signal demodulation and random body movement cancellation techniques for non-contact vital sign detection, IEEE MTT-S Int Microw Symp Dig, 567
  15. 10.1063/1.2798937 · DOI
  16. oum, 2008, two frequency radar sensor for non-contact vital sign monitor, IEEE MTT-S Int Microw Symp Dig, 919
  17. 10.1109/MWSYM.2009.5165949 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/62.978359 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/MWSYM.2001.966866 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/bem.2250130610 · DOI
  21. 10.1183/09031936.97.10081865 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF02441473 · DOI
  23. degroote, 1997, chest wall motion during tidal breathing, J Appl Physiol, 83, 1531, 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.5.1531 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/10.362922 · DOI
  25. jollife, 2002, Principal Component Analysis
  26. 10.1109/MWSYM.2008.4633266 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Droitcour, A. D., Boric-Lubecke, O., & Kovacs, G. T. A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
Published
2009-10
Volume
57
Issue
10
Pages
2498-2507
ISSN
  • 0018-9480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9670
OpenAlex
W2098649495
Cited by
162
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
Doppler radar, signal-to-noise ratio, heart rate measurement, respiratory rate measurement, direct conversion receiver, oscillator phase noise, radar equation, non-contact vital sign monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review