The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DNS performance and the effectiveness of caching
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed analysis of traces of domain name system (DNS) and associated TCP traffic collected on the Internet links of the MIT Laboratory for Computer Science and the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST). The first part of the analysis details how clients at these institutions interact with the wide-area domain name system, focusing on client-perceived performance and the prevalence of failures and errors. The second part evaluates the effectiveness of DNS caching. In the most recent MIT trace, 23% of lookups receive no answer; these lookups account for more than half of all traced DNS packets since query packets are retransmitted overly persistently. About 13% of all lookups result in an answer that indicates an error condition. Many of these errors appear to be caused by missing inverse (IP-to-name) mappings or NS records that point to nonexistent or inappropriate hosts. 27% of the queries sent to the root name servers result in such errors. The paper also presents the results of trace-driven simulations that explore the effect of varying time-to-live (TTL) and varying degrees of cache sharing on DNS cache hit rates. Due to the heavy-tailed nature of name accesses, reducing the TTL of address (A) records to as low as a few hundred seconds has little adverse effect on hit rates, and little benefit is obtained from sharing a forwarding DNS cache among more than 10 or 20 clients. These results suggest that client latency is not as dep…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The volume per host name is known to follow a Zipf's law [27].”
From Estimating the Total Volume of Queries to a Search Engine (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1145/144191.144301 · DOI
- 10.1145/345910.345938 · DOI
- Frazer, 1995, NSFNET: A partnership for high-speed networking
- 10.1109/65.642356 · DOI
- Balakrishnan, TCP behavior of a busy Web server: Analysis and improvements, 1, 252
- 10.17487/rfc1034 · DOI
- 10.17487/rfc1035 · DOI
- 10.1145/52325.52338 · DOI
- 10.17487/rfc1536 · DOI
- Breslau, 1998, On the implications of Zipf’s law for web caching
- 10.1109/90.650143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/319151.319153 · DOI
- 10.1109/INFCOM.2001.916678 · DOI
- Wills, 2000, The contribution of DNS lookup costs to web object retrieval
- 10.1109/SAINT.2001.905171 · DOI
- Huitema, Internet measurements: The rising tide and the DNS snag
- 10.1109/GLOCOM.2001.965864 · DOI
- Brownlee, DNS root/gTLD performance measurements
- 10.17487/rfc1321 · DOI
- Minshall, 1997, Tcpdpriv
- Jacobson, tcpdump
- 10.17487/rfc2308 · DOI
- 10.1145/263109.263155 · DOI
- Jung, 2002, Modeling TTL-based Internet caches
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Estimating the Total Volume of Queries to a Search Engine
Lillo, F., & Ruggieri, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3054668 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, J., Sit, E., Balakrishnan, H., & Morris, R.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 589-603
- ISSN
- 1063-6692
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review