The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The monitoring and early detection of Internet worms
Open accessAbstract
After many Internet-scale worm incidents in recent years, it is clear that a simple self-propagating worm can quickly spread across the Internet and cause severe damage to our society. Facing this great security threat, we need to build an early detection system that can detect the presence of a worm in the Internet as quickly as possible in order to give people accurate early warning information and possible reaction time for counteractions. This paper first presents an Internet worm monitoring system. Then, based on the idea of "detecting the trend, not the burst" of monitored illegitimate traffic, we present a "trend detection" methodology to detect a worm at its early propagation stage by using Kalman filter estimation, which is robust to background noise in the monitored data. In addition, for uniform-scan worms such as Code Red, we can effectively predict the overall vulnerable population size, and estimate accurately how many computers are really infected in the global Internet based on the biased monitored data. For monitoring a nonuniform scan worm, especially a sequential-scan worm such as Blaster, we show that it is crucial for the address space covered by the worm monitoring system to be as distributed as possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Denning, D. E. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1987.232894 · Cited by 3,427
Intrusion detection using sequences of system calls
Hofmeyr, S. A., Forrest, S., & Somayaji, A. (1998) · Journal of Computer Security · doi:10.3233/jcs-980109 · Cited by 1,313
How to Own the Internet in Your Spare Time
Staniford, S., Paxson, V., & Weaver, N. C. (2002) · Cited by 1,092
A framework for constructing features and models for intrusion detection systems
Lee, W., & Stolfo, S. J. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/382912.382914 · Cited by 974
Moore, D., Paxson, V., Savage, S., Shannon, C., Staniford, S., & Weaver, N. (2003) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msecp.2003.1219056 · Cited by 973
Code-Red: a case study on the spread and victims of an internet worm
Moore, D., Shannon, C., & claffy, K. (2002) · Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurment - IMW '02 · doi:10.1145/637201.637244 · Cited by 787
Directed-graph epidemiological models of computer viruses
Kephart, J. O., & White, S. R. (2002) · Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/risp.1991.130801 · Cited by 769
Code red worm propagation modeling and analysis
Zou, C. C., Gong, W., & Towsley, D. (2002) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/586110.586130 · Cited by 722
Self-citationFast portscan detection using sequential hypothesis testing
Jung, J., Paxson, V., Berger, A. W., & Balakrishnan, H. (2004) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 · doi:10.1109/secpri.2004.1301325 · Cited by 660
Epidemic Modelling: An Introduction
Zelmer, D. A., Daley, D. J., & Gani, J. (2000) · The Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.2307/3284920 · Cited by 611
Cited by
The Future of False Information Detection on Social Media: New Perspectives and Trends
Guo, B., Ding, Y., Yao, L., Liang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3393880 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, C. C., Gong, W., Towsley, D., & Gao, L.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 961-974
- ISSN
- 1063-6692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1579820217
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 29.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The monitoring and early detection of Internet worms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnet.2005.857113
- The paper
- Zou, C. C., Gong, W., Towsley, D., & Gao, L. (2005). The monitoring and early detection of Internet worms. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnet.2005.857113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.