The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Unbiased Sampling for Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed examination of how the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of real-world peer-to-peer systems can introduce bias into the selection of representative samples of peer properties (e.g., degree, link bandwidth, number of files shared). We propose the metropolized random walk with backtracking (MRWB) as a viable and promising technique for collecting nearly unbiased samples and conduct an extensive simulation study to demonstrate that our technique works well for a wide variety of commonly-encountered peer-to-peer network conditions. We have implemented the MRWB algorithm for selecting peer addresses uniformly at random into a tool called ion-sampler. Using the Gnutella network, we empirically show that ion-sampler yields more accurate samples than tools that rely on commonly-used sampling techniques and results in dramatic improvements in efficiency and scalability compared to performing a full crawl.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations
Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2005) · Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining · doi:10.1145/1081870.1081893 · Cited by 2,281
Cited by
Random walks and diffusion on networks
Masuda, N., Porter, M. A., & Lambiotte, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.007 · Cited by 657
Examining the evolution of the Twitter elite network
Motamedi, R., Jamshidi, S., Rejaie, R., & Willinger, W. (2020) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-019-0612-8 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stutzbach, D., Rejaie, R., Duffield, N., Sen, S., & Willinger, W.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 377-390
- ISSN
- 1063-6692 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2566
- OpenAlex
- W2170358724
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Unbiased Sampling for Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnet.2008.2001730
- The paper
- Stutzbach, D., Rejaie, R., Duffield, N., Sen, S., & Willinger, W. (2009). On Unbiased Sampling for Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnet.2008.2001730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.