The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Traffic Modeling and Proportional Partial Caching for Peer-to-Peer Systems
Abstract
Peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing systems generate a major portion of the Internet traffic, and this portion is expected to increase in the future. We explore the potential of deploying proxy caches in different autonomous systems (ASes) with the goal of reducing the cost incurred by Internet service providers and alleviating the load on the Internet backbone. We conduct an eight-month measurement study to analyze the P2P traffic characteristics that are relevant to caching, such as object popularity, popularity dynamics, and object size. Our study shows that the popularity of P2P objects can be modeled by a Mandelbrot-Zipf distribution, and that several workloads exist in P2P traffic. Guided by our findings, we develop a novel caching algorithm for P2P traffic that is based on object segmentation, and proportional partial admission and eviction of objects. Our trace-based simulations show that with a relatively small cache size, a byte hit rate of up to 35% can be achieved by our algorithm, which is close to the byte hit rate achieved by an off-line optimal algorithm with complete knowledge of future requests. Our results also show that our algorithm achieves a byte hit rate that is at least 40% more, and at most triple, the byte hit rate of the common Web caching algorithms. Furthermore, our algorithm is robust in face of aborted downloads, which is a common case in P2P systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Karagiannis, T., Broido, A., Brownlee, N., Claffy, K. C., & Faloutsos, M. (2005) · IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04. · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1378239 · Cited by 504
Cited by
Wang, X., Wang, C., Li, X., Leung, V. C. M., & Taleb, T. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2986803 · Cited by 402
Caching in information centric networking: A survey
Zhang, G., Li, Y., & Lin, T. (2013) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2013.07.007 · Cited by 358
Distributed and cloud computing: from parallel processing to the Internet of things
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5712 · Cited by 314
A Survey of IoT Applications in Blockchain Systems: Architecture, Consensus, and Traffic Modeling
Lao, L., Li, Z., Hou, S., Xiao, B., Guo, S., & Yang, Y. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3372136 · Cited by 304
Li, X., Wang, X., Wan, P.-J., Han, Z., & Leung, V. C. M. (2018) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2018.2844658 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Hefeeda, M., & Saleh, O.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1447-1460
- ISSN
- 1063-6692 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2566
- OpenAlex
- W2096411785
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traffic Modeling and Proportional Partial Caching for Peer-to-Peer Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnet.2008.918081
- The paper
- Hefeeda, M., & Saleh, O. (2008). Traffic Modeling and Proportional Partial Caching for Peer-to-Peer Systems. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnet.2008.918081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.