Cited by 66Neural Networks and ApplicationsMachine Learning and ELMHydrological Forecasting Using AI

Contextual Processing of Structured Data by Recursive Cascade Correlation

Micheli, A., Sona, D., Sperduti, A.·2004·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks

Abstract

This paper propose a first approach to deal with contextual information in structured domains by recursive neural networks. The proposed model, i.e., contextual recursive cascade correlation (CRCC), a generalization of the recursive cascade correlation (RCC) model, is able to partially remove the causality assumption by exploiting contextual information stored in frozen units. We formally characterize the properties of CRCC showing that it is able to compute contextual transductions and also some causal supersource transductions that RCC cannot compute. Experimental results on controlled sequences and on a real-world task involving chemical structures confirm the computational limitations of RCC, while assessing the efficiency and efficacy of CRCC in dealing both with pure causal and contextual prediction tasks. Moreover, results obtained for the real-world task show the superiority of the proposed approach versus RCC when exploring a task for which it is not known whether the structural causality assumption holds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnn.2004.837783

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Constrained by computational power, earlier research mainly focused on directed acyclic graphs.

    “Constrained by computational power, earlier research mainly focused on directed acyclic graphs [13], [80].”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [80]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Micheli, A., Sona, D., & Sperduti, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
Published
2004-11
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
1396-1410
ISSN
1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000375074
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Keywords
recursive neural networks, contextual information, chemical structure prediction, structured data
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Decision Support Techniques, Feedback, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Statistics as Topic, Logistic Models, Information Storage and Retrieval, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review