The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learn$^{++}$.NC: Combining Ensemble of Classifiers With Dynamically Weighted Consult-and-Vote for Efficient Incremental Learning of New Classes
Abstract
We have previously introduced an incremental learning algorithm Learn(++), which learns novel information from consecutive data sets by generating an ensemble of classifiers with each data set, and combining them by weighted majority voting. However, Learn(++) suffers from an inherent "outvoting" problem when asked to learn a new class omega(new) introduced by a subsequent data set, as earlier classifiers not trained on this class are guaranteed to misclassify omega(new) instances. The collective votes of earlier classifiers, for an inevitably incorrect decision, then outweigh the votes of the new classifiers' correct decision on omega(new) instances--until there are enough new classifiers to counteract the unfair outvoting. This forces Learn(++) to generate an unnecessarily large number of classifiers. This paper describes Learn(++).NC, specifically designed for efficient incremental learning of multiple new classes using significantly fewer classifiers. To do so, Learn (++).NC introduces dynamically weighted consult and vote (DW-CAV), a novel voting mechanism for combining classifiers: individual classifiers consult with each other to determine which ones are most qualified to classify a given instance, and decide how much weight, if any, each classifier's decision should carry. Experiments on real-world problems indicate that the new algorithm performs remarkably well with substantially fewer classifiers, not only as compared to its predecessor Learn(++), but also as compared to several other algorithms recently proposed for similar problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Wolpert, D. H. (1992) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1 · Cited by 7,951
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600
Hansen, L. K., & Salamon, P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.58871 · Cited by 4,260
Cited by
iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learning
Rebuffi, S.-A., Kolesnikov, A., Sperl, G., & Lampert, C. H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.587 · Cited by 3,988
Dong, X., Yu, Z., Cao, W., Shi, Y., & Ma, Q. (2020) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-019-8208-z · Cited by 1,928
Ensemble learning for data stream analysis: A survey
Krawczyk, B., Minku, L. L., Gama, J., Stefanowski, J., & Woźniak, M. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.004 · Cited by 1,050
A Survey on Ensemble Learning for Data Stream Classification
Gomes, H. M., Barddal, J. P., Enembreck, F., & Bifet, A. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3054925 · Cited by 579
Incremental Learning of Concept Drift from Streaming Imbalanced Data
Ditzler, G., & Polikar, R. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2012.136 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Muhlbaier, M. D., Topalis, A., & Polikar, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 152-168
- ISSN
- 1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0093
- OpenAlex
- W2161208102
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learn$^{++}$.NC: Combining Ensemble of Classifiers With Dynamically Weighted Consult-and-Vote for Efficient Incremental Learning of New Classes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnn.2008.2008326
- The paper
- Muhlbaier, M. D., Topalis, A., & Polikar, R. (2009). Learn$^{++}$.NC: Combining Ensemble of Classifiers With Dynamically Weighted Consult-and-Vote for Efficient Incremental Learning of New Classes. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnn.2008.2008326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.