The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incremental Learning of Concept Drift in Nonstationary Environments
Abstract
We introduce an ensemble of classifiers-based approach for incremental learning of concept drift, characterized by nonstationary environments (NSEs), where the underlying data distributions change over time. The proposed algorithm, named Learn(++). NSE, learns from consecutive batches of data without making any assumptions on the nature or rate of drift; it can learn from such environments that experience constant or variable rate of drift, addition or deletion of concept classes, as well as cyclical drift. The algorithm learns incrementally, as other members of the Learn(++) family of algorithms, that is, without requiring access to previously seen data. Learn(++). NSE trains one new classifier for each batch of data it receives, and combines these classifiers using a dynamically weighted majority voting. The novelty of the approach is in determining the voting weights, based on each classifier's time-adjusted accuracy on current and past environments. This approach allows the algorithm to recognize, and act accordingly, to the changes in underlying data distributions, as well as to a possible reoccurrence of an earlier distribution. We evaluate the algorithm on several synthetic datasets designed to simulate a variety of nonstationary environments, as well as a real-world weather prediction dataset. Comparisons with several other approaches are also included. Results indicate that Learn(++). NSE can track the changing environments very closely, regardless of the type of concept drift. To allow future use, comparison and benchmarking by interested researchers, we also release our data used in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600
Cited by
A survey on concept drift adaptation
Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2523813 · Cited by 3,735
Big data deep learning: Challenges and perspectives
Chen, X.-W., & Lin, X. (2014) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2014.2325029 · Cited by 1,255
Ensemble learning for data stream analysis: A survey
Krawczyk, B., Minku, L. L., Gama, J., Stefanowski, J., & Woźniak, M. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.004 · Cited by 1,050
Learning under Concept Drift: A Review
Lu, J., Liu, A., Dong, F., Gu, F., Gama, J., & Zhang, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2876857 · Cited by 1,603
A Survey on Ensemble Learning for Data Stream Classification
Gomes, H. M., Barddal, J. P., Enembreck, F., & Bifet, A. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3054925 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Elwell, R., & Polikar, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1517-1531
- ISSN
- 1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0093
- OpenAlex
- W2160512933
- Cited by
- 931
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incremental Learning of Concept Drift in Nonstationary Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnn.2011.2160459
- The paper
- Elwell, R., & Polikar, R. (2011). Incremental Learning of Concept Drift in Nonstationary Environments. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnn.2011.2160459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.