The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parallel Reservoir Computing Using Optical Amplifiers
Abstract
Reservoir computing (RC), a computational paradigm inspired on neural systems, has become increasingly popular in recent years for solving a variety of complex recognition and classification problems. Thus far, most implementations have been software-based, limiting their speed and power efficiency. Integrated photonics offers the potential for a fast, power efficient and massively parallel hardware implementation. We have previously proposed a network of coupled semiconductor optical amplifiers as an interesting test case for such a hardware implementation. In this paper, we investigate the important design parameters and the consequences of process variations through simulations. We use an isolated word recognition task with babble noise to evaluate the performance of the photonic reservoirs with respect to traditional software reservoir implementations, which are based on leaky hyperbolic tangent functions. Our results show that the use of coherent light in a well-tuned reservoir architecture offers significant performance benefits. The most important design parameters are the delay and the phase shift in the system's physical connections. With optimized values for these parameters, coherent semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) reservoirs can achieve better results than traditional simulated reservoirs. We also show that process variations hardly degrade the performance, but amplifier noise can be detrimental. This effect must therefore be taken into account when designing SOA-based RC implementations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harnessing Nonlinearity: Predicting Chaotic Systems and Saving Energy in Wireless Communication
Jaeger, H., & Haas, H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091277 · Cited by 3,811
Saleh, B. E. A., & Teich, M. C. (1991) · doi:10.1002/0471213748 · Cited by 3,383
Cited by
Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: A review
Tanaka, G., Yamane, T., Héroux, J. B., Nakane, R., Kanazawa, N., Takeda, S., Numata, H., Nakano, D., & Hirose, A. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.03.005 · Cited by 2,146
All-Optical Reservoir Computing on a Photonic Chip Using Silicon-Based Ring Resonators
Coarer, F. D.-L., Sciamanna, M., Katumba, A., Freiberger, M., Dambre, J., Bienstman, P., & Rontani, D. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2018.2836985 · Cited by 119
Self-citationA coherent perceptron for all-optical learning
Tezak, N., & Mabuchi, H. (2015) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-015-0023-3 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandoorne, K., Dambre, J., Verstraeten, D., Schrauwen, B., & Bienstman, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1469-1481
- ISSN
- 1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0093
- OpenAlex
- W2126273023
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel Reservoir Computing Using Optical Amplifiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnn.2011.2161771
- The paper
- Vandoorne, K., Dambre, J., Verstraeten, D., Schrauwen, B., & Bienstman, P. (2011). Parallel Reservoir Computing Using Optical Amplifiers. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnn.2011.2161771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.